Brexit: what the legal advice reveals
Six-page document released after Government found to be in contempt of Parliament
Theresa May’s Brexit plan to avoid a hard Irish border will “endure indefinitely” until the UK and European Union put in a place a new long-term trading relationship, according to newly published legal advice from Attorney General Geoffrey Cox.
The Government released the six-page document today, hours after being found to be in contempt of Parliament for failing to do so earlier.
Cox’s paper “could influence MPs ahead of the crunch Commons vote on May’s Brexit deal due on Tuesday next week”, says the Financial Times.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The legal status of the arrangements for preventing a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic - and in particular, the UK’s ability to extricate itself from them - “are at the heart of the political row about whether MPs should accept the prime minister’s deal”, says The Guardian.
What does the legal advice say?
A key paragraph in Cox’s formerly confidential advice “spells out that ending the so-called backstop is not merely a matter of relying on both parties to agree to do so in good faith”, says The Independent.
If the EU and the UK fail to agree that the protocol is no longer needed, “it is extremely difficult to see how a five-member arbitral panel made up of lawyers who were independent of the parties would be prepared to make a judgment as whether the protocol is no longer necessary, in the absence of the consent of the parties”, Cox writes.
Cox’s legal advice “is politically very very problematic for [the government] in terms of the ‘trap’ of the backstop”, tweets the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg.
Cox writes that “despite statements in the [withdrawal agreement] protocol that [the backstop] is not intended to be permanent, and the clear intention of the parties that it should be replaced by alternative, permanent arrangements, in international law the protocol would endure indefinitely until a superseding agreement took its place”.
The backstop would carry on “even when negotiations have clearly broken down” on a future trading relationship, Cox warns.
“In the absence of a right of termination [on the backstop], there is a legal risk that the United Kingdom might become subject to protracted and repeating rounds of negotiations,” he adds.
How have MPs reacted?
The details of the advice “are likely to inflame the concerns of pro-Brexit MPs who fear the temporary arrangements in the backstop could become permanent”, says The Guardian.
Cox argues that the “review mechanism”, painted by Downing Street as a negotiating victory, “adds little, other than procedurally, to the international law position to which the protocol is already subject”.
His paper has been described as “devastating” by Nigel Dodds, deputy leader of the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), which props up May’s Conservative Party in government.
Dodds tweeted: “For all the prime minister’s promises and pledges the legal advice is crystal clear. In her words, no British prime minister could ever accept such a situation.”
A statement from his party said that the legal advice confirms the backstop would be “totally unacceptable and economically mad” because of its impact on Northern Ireland.
Meanwhile, Labour’s shadow Brexit secretary, Keir Starmer, tweeted: “All week we have heard from Government ministers that releasing this information could harm the national interest. Nothing of the sort. All this advice reveals is the central weaknesses in the Government’s deal. It is unthinkable that the Government tried to keep this information from Parliament - and indeed the public - before next week’s vote.”
But others including former government lawyer David Allen Green are less sure that the document adds anything particularly new to the debate.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
'It may not be surprising that creative work is used without permission'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
5 simple items to help make your airplane seat more comfortable
The Week Recommends Gel cushions and inflatable travel pillows make a world of difference
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Donald Trump wreck the Brexit deal?
Today's Big Question President-elect's victory could help UK's reset with the EU, but a free-trade agreement with the US to dodge his threatened tariffs could hinder it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
For God and country: is religion in politics making a comeback?
Talking Point There are many MPs of faith in the new Labour government despite it being the most openly secular House of Commons in history
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published