Biden's Afghanistan refugee dilemma
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6eb0/a6eb02b95e49650fbcb7908943fed9254126813f" alt="Afghanistan refugee."
President Biden is taking flak for his timid position on admitting refugees to the United States from Afghanistan amid a messy withdrawal. The Atlantic's George Packer quotes Biden as telling a fellow Obama administration official back in 2010 that these refugees shouldn't be a priority as U.S. troops departed: "Fuck that, we don't have to worry about that. We did it in Vietnam, Nixon and Kissinger got away with it."
That's a dumb and ugly sentiment reminiscent of some quotes attributed to Biden's predecessor. It also appears to be consistent with what he said publicly as a senator about refugees from the Vietnam war: "The United States has no obligation to evacuate one, or 100,001, South Vietnamese."
The U.S. has a moral obligation to translators and others who helped the 20-year war effort in Afghanistan, many of whom are at risk of slaughter by the Taliban. Even former President Trump has said as much in a statement calling for the evacuation of American civilians and "others who have been good to our Country and who should be allowed to seek refuge" (though he did later send a follow-up complaining that an oft-photographed plane leaving Kabul appeared to be filled with Afghan nationals rather than Americans).
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Nevertheless, Biden is right to be cautious. The reason the U.S. has spent the last two decades in Afghanistan is that there is a substantial terrorist risk there, so a vetting system is required. There are also different cultural and religious values in Afghanistan, even among many of the relatively liberal people who would be inclined to support Western militaries against the Taliban.
There is also the significant challenge Biden has taken on in trying to defuse the populist trend that fueled Trump's rise to power. Hillary Clinton has raised migration as a major source of right-wing populism in Europe. So has John Kerry, though he considers climate change a major driver of these shifts.
None of this is an argument against taking refugees, and it certainly does not obviate our duty to people who were bona fide close allies in the Afghanistan war, one of several military interventions that destabilized the region. But it does require careful thought about numbers and location, both for the benefit of Americans and to ensure that this country, which has seen backlash due to refugees in the past, remains welcoming in the future.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
W. James Antle III is the politics editor of the Washington Examiner, the former editor of The American Conservative, and author of Devouring Freedom: Can Big Government Ever Be Stopped?.
-
Today's political cartoons - February 20, 2025
Cartoons Thursday's cartoons - post-mortem negotiations, problematic immigration, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The Years at the Harold Pinter Theatre: an 'unmissable' evening
The Week Recommends Eline Arbo's 'spellbinding' adaptation of Annie Ernaux's memoir transfers to the West End
By The Week UK Published
-
The White Lotus: a delicious third helping of Mike White's toxic feast
The Week Recommends 'Wickedly funny' comedy-drama stars Jason Isaacs, Walton Goggins and Aimee Lou Wood
By The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump lead to more or fewer nuclear weapons in the world?
Talking Points He wants denuclearization. But critics worry about proliferation.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Why Trump and Musk are shutting down the CFPB
Talking Points And what it means for American consumers
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Are we now in a constitutional crisis?
Talking Points Trump and Musk defy Congress and the courts
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
What can Democrats do to oppose Trump?
Talking Points The minority party gets off to a 'slow start' in opposition
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Five things Biden will be remembered for
The Explainer Key missteps mean history may not be kind to the outgoing US president
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
Palestinians and pro-Palestine allies brace for Trump
TALKING POINTS After a year of protests, crackdowns, and 'Uncommitted' electoral activism, Palestinian activists are rethinking their tactics ahead of another Trump administration
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published