How to be cool, according to science

If you're a leader, or aspire to be one, charisma matters. It gives you a competitive advantage in attracting and retaining the very best talent. It makes people want to work with you, your team, and your company. Research shows that those following charismatic leaders perform better, experience their work as more meaningful, and have more trust in their leaders than those following effective but noncharismatic leaders. [The Charisma Myth: How Anyone Can Master the Art and Science of Personal Magnetism]

The most commonly held myth that I encountered when first doing this research was that charisma is an innate quality, that some people have it and some people don't and whatever you're born with you're stuck with. In fact, charisma's a quality that fluctuates. It'll be there one moment and gone the next. It's also a very learnable quality. So, a lot of people who are known today as some of the most charismatic people actually learned charisma step by step.

Can you imagine James Bond fidgeting? How about tugging at his clothing, bobbing his head, or twitching his shoulders? How about hemming and hawing before he speaks? Of course not. Bond is the quintessential cool, calm, and collected character…

This kind of high-status, high-confidence body language is characterized by how few movements are made. Composed people exhibit a level of stillness, which is sometimes described as poise. They avoid extraneous, superfluous gestures such as fidgeting with their clothes, their hair, or their faces, incessantly nodding their heads, or saying "um" before sentences. [The Charisma Myth: How Anyone Can Master the Art and Science of Personal Magnetism]

"Modest men were not liked as much as modest women because they were viewed as 'too weak' for a man and because they were viewed as insufficiently confident and ambitious," the U.S. researchers wrote. [The Daily Mail]

The second factor, which explained a more modest amount of the variance, was comprised of five elements each rated as more cool than socially desirable. The elements of factor two either did not load on factor one (e.g.,irony) or loaded in the opposite direction (e.g.,emotional control). Rebelliousness had the highest loading, and is arguably its most central theoretical element. This second factor better embodies the core construct identified as cool in the scholarly literature (Frank, 1997; Heath & Potter, 2004; Pountain & Robins, 2000). This factor presents coolness as more opaque, less active, and less engaged: coolness as detachment and camouflage. We termed this factor Contrarian coolness.

In every minute we have hundreds of thousands of body language signals that are pouring out from us and broadcasting how we're feeling and thinking to everyone around…

The same way that athletes get themselves "into the zone" you get yourself into a mental zone of whatever body language you want to emanate. And that way it will cascade through your body from whatever mindset that you wanted to get. So it really is mind over matter in the sense that whatever's in your mind will come out through your body language.

Students exposed to Ceci's enthusiastic presentations were much more positive about both the instructor and the course — even though everything else was identical. They perceived him as more enthusiastic and knowledgeable, more tolerant of others' views, more accessible to students, and more organized. [The Tell: The Little Clues That Reveal Big Truths about Who We Are]