U.S. will wait Karzai out
American officials plan to wait until the Afghan president leaves office this spring to complete a long-delayed security pact.
In a sign of the Obama administration’s growing frustration with Hamid Karzai, U.S. officials this week revealed that they would wait until the Afghan president leaves office this spring to complete a long-delayed security pact that will decide how many, if any, American troops remain in the country beyond 2014. The U.S. wants to leave 10,000 troops in the country to take part in counterterrorism operations and train Afghan forces after NATO’s mission ends in December. But Karzai has repeatedly declined to sign a deal authorizing a foreign troop presence. Tired of the president’s antagonistic behavior—he has recently taken part in secret negotiations with the Taliban and accused U.S. troops of war crimes—American officials said they would conclude the agreement with Karzai’s successor, to be chosen in national elections this April.
This mess perfectly sums up the futility of our Afghanistan mission, said Steve Chapman in the Chicago Tribune. We’ve spent about $700 billion and sacrificed more than 2,000 American lives over the past decade propping up Karzai’s regime. Yet the country remains corrupt and violence-prone, and its leader “sounds as hostile and extreme” as our Taliban enemies. Instead of hoping that Karzai’s successor will be any better, we should simply acknowledge there are some things “the world’s sole superpower can’t do, and fixing Afghanistan is one of them.”
Karzai’s behavior is frustrating, but rational, said Peter Tomsen in Politico.com. While he’s not running in April’s presidential election, “he does seem to be maneuvering for future relevance.” Bashing America is one way to boost his standing with Islamist militants and ordinary Afghans tired of war, allowing Karzai to “position himself as a future bridge between the Taliban and the next Afghan government.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Whatever game Karzai is playing, the U.S. can’t walk away from Afghanistan, said The Baltimore Sun in an editorial. Without our support, Afghan government forces would lose much of the country to the Taliban and terrorist-training camps would again dot Afghanistan, just as they did before 9/11. That leaves the Obama administration with no choice but to sit tight and hope that Karzai’s eventual successor proves more adept “at holding up the Afghans’ end of the bargain.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
What are the different types of nuclear weapons?
The Explainer Speculation mounts that post-war taboo on nuclear weapons could soon be shattered by use of 'battlefield' missiles
-
Floral afternoon teas to enjoy during the Chelsea Flower Show
The Week Recommends These are the prettiest spots in the city to savour a traditional treat
-
How to plan a trip along the Mississippi River
The Week Recommends See this vital waterway from the Great River Road
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy