Obama: 4 ways to reform the surveillance state
The president proposes changes aimed at restoring "confidence" in America's spying programs
President Obama on Friday announced during a press conference that his administration would update the government's spying policies, adding new layers of oversight and making them more transparent to assuage Americans' concerns about the nation's clandestine intelligence-gathering operations.
The announcement was the president's most concrete response to recent criticisms of the surveillance state, the scope of which was illuminated by leaked information provided by Edward Snowden, the fugitive former contractor for the National Security Agency who last week gained asylum in Russia.
The president laid out four specific proposals, which are as follows:
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Reforming the Patriot Act
The president said he would push for "appropriate reforms" to section 215 of the Patriot Act, which pertains to the collection of phone records. However, he refrained from offering specifics on just what those reforms would look like.
"This program is an important tool in our effort to disrupt terrorist plots [but] given the scale of those programs I understand the concerns of those who worry worry that it could be subject to abuse," he said.
The NSA's massive collection of phone records — including those of American citizens — has sparked an outcry from civil libertarians who say the practice is unconstitutional.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Congress would need to approve of any changes to the Patriot Act, which, given that body's inability to pass much of anything lately, may be a heavy lift.
Opening the FISA court to opposing arguments
A secretive court set up by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act has the sole authority to sign off on federal wiretaps and other NSA snooping requests. Yet the court meets in private, and it only hears from one party: The government.
That will change, Obama said, announcing that he would work with Congress to allow an opposing side to air its arguments before the FISA court. That opposition group would be comprised of civil liberties advocates and intelligence experts, he said.
Critics have argued that the court acts as a rubber stamp on federal spy requests, in part because it does not hear any counter arguments. Though the court, established in the 1970s, was initially charged only with approving wiretaps, it has since taken on a far larger role, reviewing requests for massive spying operations that critics say entail constitutional precedents that have yet to be challenged.
Making U.S. intelligence operations more transparent
Obama said he wanted the U.S. intelligence community to declassify as much information as possible. Specifically, he said he would have the Justice Department publicly explain its rationale for collecting phone records under the Patriot Act.
He also said his administration would launch a website with details of its national security operations. In a conference call with reporters, a senior administration official described the website as "a home for citizens who are interested in learning more about our activities and declassifying efforts in responding to queries that people have about these programs."
Consulting outside experts for input on U.S. spy programs
The president said he would have his administration work with experts outside the government to review the nation's security programs and ensure they are effective without encroaching too greatly on Americans' civil liberties. Those experts could include former intelligence officials, civil libertarians, and policy analysts.
Again, Obama did not delve too deeply into specifics about how this oversight would work, saying only that it would add a new layer of review to the government's intelligence-gathering operations.
Jon Terbush is an associate editor at TheWeek.com covering politics, sports, and other things he finds interesting. He has previously written for Talking Points Memo, Raw Story, and Business Insider.
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published