New rules on contraception
The Obama administration has proposed a new compromise on its controversial contraception policy.
The Obama administration has proposed a new compromise on its controversial contraception policy that would exempt religiously-affiliated employers from paying for birth control through health insurance, while guaranteeing that their employees will have contraception covered by a separate insurance policy. Facing a wave of lawsuits from religious groups that say providing contraception coverage infringes their freedom of conscience, the White House has broadened the definition of a religious organization to include hospitals, schools, and universities, and ensured that they don’t pay for contraception even indirectly. “The administration is taking the next step in providing women across the nation with coverage of recommended preventive care at no cost, while respecting religious concerns,” said Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
This is a “reasonable compromise between religious objections and the right of women to affordable birth control,” said The New York Times in an editorial. The administration was never out to curtail religious freedom, despite what its critics have claimed in trying to “discredit the health-care reform law.”
It looks to me like “a parlor trick,” said Michael Gerson in The Washington Post. The administration is just trying to wiggle a way through the legal challenges—44 and counting—to its mandate for services that many religious people believe the government shouldn’t be paying for, including day-after pills, which some consider abortifacients. It has “made no attempt to deal with the hard cases,” such as why a business “with a highly religious owner” should still be forced to pay for contraception.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Obviously, “not everybody will be happy,” said Michelle Cottle in TheDailyBeast.com. But a chastened White House has tried to mute “the my-way-or-the-highway bossiness” of its original proposal, and now the debate over contraception looks calmer than it did a year ago. While the new tweaks won’t convince “hard-core opponents of contraceptive coverage,” they make it harder to cast Obama as an “amoral elitist determined to ram his views down the throats of decent God-fearing Americans.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Musk wins $1 trillion Tesla pay packageSpeed Read The package would expand his stake in the company to 25%
-
Political cartoons for November 7Cartoons Friday’s political cartoons include a party at Mar-a-Lago, a handy chart for ICE, the Republican train wreck and Nancy Pelosi's retirement
-
Trump ordered to fully fund SNAPSpeed Read The Justice Department is appealing the decision
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration