The fight over Egypt’s future

Secular opponents of Egypt’s Islamist President Mohammed Mursi warned this week that the country was returning to dictatorship, as Egyptians prepared to vote on a divisive, Islamist-drafted constitution. In Cairo, thousands of the president’s mostly secular opponents protested the proposed constitution outside the barricaded presidential palace, saying that the document paves the way for sharia law. “They’re not Muslims, they’re extremists,” protester Nihal Amin said of Mursi and his Muslim Brotherhood backers. Mursi responded by signing an order allowing the army to arrest protesters. Egypt has undergone weeks of unrest since Mursi issued a decree placing himself and the Islamist-dominated assembly drafting the new constitution above judicial oversight. The president withdrew those edicts last week, but only after the assembly finalized its draft. The opposition urged Egyptians to vote “no” in the Dec. 15 referendum, but vowed to fight on if the charter is approved.

This constitution “lays the groundwork for an eminently unfree future,” said Frida Ghitis in CNN.com. It’s “littered with tiny seeds that can germinate into religious oppression,” such as its declaration that sharia will be the cornerstone of national law and its ban on “insulting prophets and messengers”—a clause that could be used to silence opponents.

The Obama administration has acted as Mursi’s enabler throughout this crisis, said David Ignatius in The Washington Post. It failed to condemn him when he grabbed power through decree, and Obama has stayed silent on this deeply flawed constitution. “It’s crazy for Washington to appear to take sides against those who want a liberal, tolerant Egypt and for those who favor sharia.” But that’s where the administration has ended up.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Actually, the constitution isn’t that bad, said Bloomberg.com in an editorial. It protects against arbitrary arrest, enshrines freedom of association, and limits the president to two 4-year terms. That’s why the “no” campaign is expected to win 30 percent of the vote at best. The document can be amended by a parliament that will be elected once the constitution is approved. So if the opposition really wants to safeguard democracy, it needs to get its supporters off the street and into office.