Mitt Romney's 13 percent tax claim: Did it make matters worse?
Romney finally showed part of his hand in the standoff with Democrats over his tax returns. He might have been better off saying nothing

In July, Mitt Romney told ABC News' David Muir that he'd be "happy to go back and look" at his tax returns to see if, as Muir asked, he had ever paid less than the 13.9 percent tax rate he reported in 2010. On Thursday, at the end of a press conference in South Carolina, Romney had his reply: "I did go back and look at my taxes and over the past 10 years I never paid less than 13 percent," he said, calling the "fascination" with his taxes "very small-minded compared to the broad issues that we face" in the U.S. Romney then called Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-Nev.) unsubstantiated claim that the GOP presidential candidate paid zero taxes for a decade "totally false," insisting, "I paid taxes every single year." Does this put to rest the recent flap over Romney's taxes, or did he just make things worse for himself?
Yes. He's just digging himself deeper: Romney's 13 percent claim "is woefully unacceptable," and probably just "makes his tax-return troubles worse," says Steve Benen at The Maddow Blog. For starters, unless he forks over his returns, his answer boils down to "trust me," and based on his history of misleading claims, "Romney isn't in a position to say 'trust me'." Also, 13 percent of what? Taxable income? Total income? He doesn't say. Finally, how can a multimillionaire like Romney not get that "13 percent isn't a tax burden worth bragging about"?
"Romney makes his tax-return troubles worse"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Romney at least shifted the debate: Well, 13 percent is better than zero, says Chris Cillizza at The Washington Post. "Romney's answer won't satisfy everyone," but his on-the-record insistence that he has paid at least that much "has changed the game": To keep the no taxes story alive, it's now Reid, Obama, and other Democrats who have to "put up or shut up." And without their own evidence, they're asking the American public to take the "leap" to believing "a major party presidential candidate willingly lied about his financial past." Good luck with that.
"Mitt Romney seeks to shift the tax return debate"
Welcome to the new politics: Romney even addressing the tax issue "is a huge victory for the Obama campaign," says Michael Scherer at TIME, as well as "for all those who believe in smarmy politics." By responding to Reid's "baseless allegation," Romney has guaranteed another round of speculation about what's so damaging in his tax returns. If it seems unfair that Romney has to disprove "absurd accusations," it is. And nobody knows that better than Obama, who has spent his whole presidency battling the same "Show-Me-Your-Papers politics" from the Right.
"Another win for show-me-your-papers politics"
Read more political coverage at The Week's 2012 Election Center.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published