Is Obama wrong to 'declare war' on the Supreme Court?
The president whips partisans into a frenzy by warning conservative justices that overturning ObamaCare would constitute the very judicial activism they despise
President Obama went out on a limb Monday, predicting that the Supreme Court would not overturn his signature health-care overhaul, even though several members of the court's conservative wing appear poised to declare that the law's centerpiece, the individual mandate to buy health insurance, is unconstitutional. The president says he thinks the court will realize that such an "unprecedented step" — negating the work of a majority of both chambers of Congress — would amount to the same kind of "judicial activism" that conservatives have been complaining about for years. Could such a loaded stand backfire on Obama?
Obama might regret taking on the court: It was a mistake for Obama to "declare war" on the court, says Jon Meacham at TIME. "Presidents can safely run against Congress" — a widely despised institution — but voters don't like hearing assaults on the court itself, probably because Americans believe "life needs umpires, even ones who blow calls now and then." Obama should have been more subtle to avoid frightening independents with an "unsettling rhetorical attack on the judiciary."
"Why Obama shouldn't declare war on the Supreme Court"
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
This is a necessary show of strength: ObamaCare is the president's "signature first-term accomplishment," says Taylor Marsh at her blog. So he had to do something to protect this "historic law" from conservative justices who "have a history of wielding their ideology recklessly," and, as Obama pointed out, are "unelected." Firing "a shot across the bow" of Supreme Court conservatives — who brought us Citizens United and Bush v. Gore — "was a worthwhile effort to make."
"President Obama takes on Supreme Court hubris"
The president just wants to get Democrats riled up: "Don't take this too seriously," says Allahpundit at Hot Air. Obama is talking to voters, not the Supreme Court. He's telling the "non-lawyers watching at home" that it would be extraordinary for the court to overturn his law, not because he believes it, but because he knows his backers are more likely to turn out in November if they see the ruling as illegitimate. So relax: "It's a stump speech."
"Obama: I sure hope the Supreme Court doesn’t do something unprecedented by striking down ObamaCare"
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Political cartoons for January 25Cartoons Sunday's political cartoons include a hot economy, A.I. wisdom, and more
-
Le Pen back in the dock: the trial that’s shaking FranceIn the Spotlight Appealing her four-year conviction for embezzlement, the Rassemblement National leader faces an uncertain political future, whatever the result
-
The doctors’ strikesThe Explainer Resident doctors working for NHS England are currently voting on whether to go out on strike again this year
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred