Is Obama wrong to 'declare war' on the Supreme Court?
The president whips partisans into a frenzy by warning conservative justices that overturning ObamaCare would constitute the very judicial activism they despise

President Obama went out on a limb Monday, predicting that the Supreme Court would not overturn his signature health-care overhaul, even though several members of the court's conservative wing appear poised to declare that the law's centerpiece, the individual mandate to buy health insurance, is unconstitutional. The president says he thinks the court will realize that such an "unprecedented step" — negating the work of a majority of both chambers of Congress — would amount to the same kind of "judicial activism" that conservatives have been complaining about for years. Could such a loaded stand backfire on Obama?
Obama might regret taking on the court: It was a mistake for Obama to "declare war" on the court, says Jon Meacham at TIME. "Presidents can safely run against Congress" — a widely despised institution — but voters don't like hearing assaults on the court itself, probably because Americans believe "life needs umpires, even ones who blow calls now and then." Obama should have been more subtle to avoid frightening independents with an "unsettling rhetorical attack on the judiciary."
"Why Obama shouldn't declare war on the Supreme Court"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
This is a necessary show of strength: ObamaCare is the president's "signature first-term accomplishment," says Taylor Marsh at her blog. So he had to do something to protect this "historic law" from conservative justices who "have a history of wielding their ideology recklessly," and, as Obama pointed out, are "unelected." Firing "a shot across the bow" of Supreme Court conservatives — who brought us Citizens United and Bush v. Gore — "was a worthwhile effort to make."
"President Obama takes on Supreme Court hubris"
The president just wants to get Democrats riled up: "Don't take this too seriously," says Allahpundit at Hot Air. Obama is talking to voters, not the Supreme Court. He's telling the "non-lawyers watching at home" that it would be extraordinary for the court to overturn his law, not because he believes it, but because he knows his backers are more likely to turn out in November if they see the ruling as illegitimate. So relax: "It's a stump speech."
"Obama: I sure hope the Supreme Court doesn’t do something unprecedented by striking down ObamaCare"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published