Why Obama is finally embracing the 'ObamaCare' label: 4 theories
Republicans use "ObamaCare" as shorthand for everything people don't like about the president's health care overhaul. Can Obama turn that around?
Critics of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act have long used the name "ObamaCare" as a pejorative to belittle the major health care overhaul. But now, as the Supreme Court weighs the constitutionality of the law, President Obama and his allies are throwing their arms around the "ObamaCare" label, too. "Hell, yeah, I'm for ObamaCare," Obama strategist David Axelrod said in an email to supporters last week. White House senior adviser David Plouffe predicted on Sunday that by the end of the decade, the GOP will regret ever coining the name ObamaCare, since it will become more popular as its main provisions start taking effect. But ObamaCare isn't particularly popular now. So why is Team Obama pushing an "I like ObamaCare" website, T-shirts, and bumper stickers? Here, four theories:
1. The best defense is a good offense
Democrats readily "acknowledge they lost [the] message fight" on health care reform, say Chris Cillizza and Aaron Blake at The Washington Post. But Team Obama sees the Supreme Court hearings as an opening for a do-over. "They lost the first fight because they played too much defense," so "now they are doing their damnedest to get on offense — early and often." Of course, it won't be an easy sell. Many individual parts of the law poll well, but the term "ObamaCare" currently "stands for everything people don't like about the law."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
2. Obama already owns "ObamaCare"
Embracing "ObamaCare" is largely a nod to reality, says Greg Sargent at The Washington Post. "The simple fact is that this law is Obama's No. 1 domestic achievement. It is his. It is ObamaCare." Democrats can read the polls, and they realize America hasn't warmed up to the law. But most of them still "know that their best course of action is to continue owning it, anyway." That smacks of desperation, says Kirsten Kukowski at the Republican National Committee. "If Obama truly wanted to own ObamaCare they would have done it long ago and not just when it became painfully obvious he's losing the battle."
3. Obama's popularity might rub off on the law
The White House sees the "ObamaCare" label as "an opening to make [the law] seem more personal," Marist polling president Lee Miringoff tells Talking Points Memo. That means using individual beneficiaries to sell different parts of the complex legislation, but also connecting it with the personal popularity of the president. As Obama himself has occasionally said since last summer, "I have no problem with folks saying 'Obama cares.' I do care." Eh, this may not work, branding expert Allen Adamson tells Reuters. People who already like the law will "intently associate it more directly with Obama," but "for the people who don't like it, [embracing 'ObamaCare' is] not going to make a lot of difference."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
4. It's the name everybody uses — why not embrace it?
Let's face it — PPACA, or even ACA, doesn't "exactly roll off the tongue," says Steve Benen at The Maddow Blog. I'm not a huge fan of personalizing laws, but "major pillars of American public life need good names," and it's "hard not to notice the ubiquity of the 'ObamaCare' label." Actually, I've always liked the name, so "I'm pleased that the Obama campaign has now made it official," says Kevin Drum at Mother Jones. "We have Pell grants and Roth IRAs, so why not ObamaCare?" More to the point, "the masses have spoken," and "ObamaCare" is "the only widely recognized name that PPACA has." If Team Obama can't beat 'em, it might as well join 'em.
-
San Francisco tackles affordability problems with free child careThe Explainer The free child care will be offered to thousands of families in the city
-
How realistic is the Democratic plan to retake the Senate this year?TODAY’S BIG QUESTION Schumer is growing bullish on his party’s odds in November — is it typical partisan optimism, or something more?
-
Taxes: It’s California vs. the billionairesFeature Larry Page and Peter Thiel may take their wealth elsewhere
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred