What happens if the Supreme Court strikes down 'ObamaCare'?
The fate of Obama's biggest domestic achievement is in the court's hands — and its supporters are bracing for the possibility of defeat

Next week, the Supreme Court will begin hearing three days of arguments over the constitutionality of President Obama's sweeping overhaul of the health care system. It is a massive piece of legislation, with numerous moving parts, that will have a significant impact on American society if it's allowed to stand. Similarly, its defeat would trigger a wave of important repercussions — not only on health care, but on Congress and the November presidential election. Here, five possible ramifications if the court rejects the controversial reform law:
1. Health care reform could go back to the drawing board
If the court strikes down the entire law, it will kill a broad new entitlement "before it has a chance to take root" and fulfill its goal of bringing coverage to 30 million people who are currently uninsured, say Mark Sherman and Ricardo Alonso Zaldivar at Insurance Journal. Parts of the law that are already in effect — such as one that allows young adults under the age of 26 to remain on their parents' coverage — would have to be "rolled back." To address rising health care costs and to cover the uninsured, Congress will have to "roll the ball up the hill again."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
2. Without the individual mandate, the system might collapse
The individual mandate — which requires most Americans to purchase insurance — is the most contentious aspect of "ObamaCare." The court might void only that element and leave the rest of the reform package intact. But without everyone in the country forced to find coverage, the system could fail. Healthy people may avoid buying insurance until they're sick, depriving the system of the revenue it needs to cover those with expensive or debilitating illnesses. If the mandate goes, Congress can replace it by imposing a "new tax" on those who opt out of health insurance, or by passing incentives to encourage young, healthy people to enroll, says David Morgan at Reuters. That's unlikely, however, because it would require bipartisan support "during an election year when Republicans are already moving to repeal" the law.
3. The health care industry could lose a ton of money
Insurance companies and hospital chains stand to benefit from the legislation, since it will offer them 30 million new customers. If the individual mandate were repealed, you'd see shares of those companies "drop steeply" because they would stand to lose all those customers, says Lewis Krauskopf at Reuters.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
4. Congress' authority may be curbed
Striking down the law would be a "grave step" in reorganizing the balance of power between Congress and the Supreme Court, Neal Katyal, a former acting U.S. solicitor general, tells The Huffington Post. The court would essentially remove Congress from "the national discourse" on how to solve the problems of health care. Instead, the court should let the democratic process work: "Look if you don't like ObamaCare, there's a very easy solution, which is to vote the president out of office."
5. Republicans would proclaim a political victory
The court's decision "will be of immense importance to Americans and a president seeking re-election in November," says Dan Robinson at Voice of America. If the law is struck down, "opponents will claim victory and argue" that Obama "mishandled his signature legislative achievement." It will also focus the conversation on the health care law, which is still politically unpopular — and Obama doesn't want that either.
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published