3 reasons why Congress should reject the payroll tax break

A partisan showdown is endangering an effort to extend a tax holiday for the middle class. But not everyone thinks that's a bad thing

The Senate's two-month extension of the payroll tax break is unworkable, says House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), whose caucus refuses to go along with the bipartisan plan.
(Image credit: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

On Tuesday, House Republicans blocked a vote on a Senate proposal to extend a payroll tax break for two months, intensifying a standoff that is threatening to increase the amount withheld from the paychecks of 160 million working Americans. President Obama quickly blasted the GOP, declaring that "the clock is ticking" and that "this is not poker... this is not a game." Without congressional action, payroll tax rates will jump on Jan. 1 from 4.2 percent to 6.2 percent, which would cost a worker who makes $50,000 a year an extra $1,000 in 2012. The Senate voted 89-10 in favor of the short-term compromise, but House Republican leaders think the measure should be adopted for a full year — and some conservatives don't want to extend the tax cut at all. Do they have a point? Here, three arguments for why Congress might want to just let this two-month payroll tax cut die:

1. We can't afford it

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up