3 reasons why Congress should reject the payroll tax break
A partisan showdown is endangering an effort to extend a tax holiday for the middle class. But not everyone thinks that's a bad thing

On Tuesday, House Republicans blocked a vote on a Senate proposal to extend a payroll tax break for two months, intensifying a standoff that is threatening to increase the amount withheld from the paychecks of 160 million working Americans. President Obama quickly blasted the GOP, declaring that "the clock is ticking" and that "this is not poker... this is not a game." Without congressional action, payroll tax rates will jump on Jan. 1 from 4.2 percent to 6.2 percent, which would cost a worker who makes $50,000 a year an extra $1,000 in 2012. The Senate voted 89-10 in favor of the short-term compromise, but House Republican leaders think the measure should be adopted for a full year — and some conservatives don't want to extend the tax cut at all. Do they have a point? Here, three arguments for why Congress might want to just let this two-month payroll tax cut die:
1. We can't afford it
The Social Security system is already "broke," says Michael Walsh at the New York Post. "and the 'payroll tax holiday' is only making it broker." The program's "trust fund" holds "nothing but federal IOUs" — the government has been spending the money to cover other expenses for decades. By 2036, there will be no nest egg for the system at all. Congress is desperate to send today's middle class this little "holiday bauble," but the truth is, this irresponsible policy is a "poisonous gift" that we just can't afford.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
2. It will stoke economic uncertainty
If you extend the tax holiday by just two months, says the National Association of Wholesale-Distributors in a letter to congressional leaders, the implication is that the rate will rise in the first quarter of the year. That "would exacerbate and escalate the uncertainty about fiscal policies that has inhibited business activity and slowed economic recovery and job creation for the last several years." To give businesses the certainty they need to hire more workers, it only makes sense if you extend the tax holiday for a full year.
3. We don't have the infrastucture to handle a short-term fix
The systems that companies use to withhold money for Social Security and Medicare are "highly complex," Pete Isberg, president of the National Payroll Reporting Consortium, tells ABC News. They usually require "at least 90 days for a change of this magnitude for software testing alone; not to mention analysis, design, coding, and implementation." Pushing a policy just for the first two months of 2012? It's simply not doable.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Music reviews: Bon Iver, Valerie June, and The Waterboys
Feature "Sable, Fable," "Owls, Omens, and Oracles," "Life, Death, and Dennis Hopper"
By The Week US
-
Are bonds worth investing in?
the explainer They can diversify your portfolio and tend to be a safer investment than stocks
By Becca Stanek, The Week US
-
Elon has his 'Legion.' How will Republicans encourage other Americans to have babies?
Today's Big Question The pronatalist movement finds itself in power
By Joel Mathis, The Week US
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK