Should Sarah Palin sue over Joe McGinniss' scathing biography?
A Palin attorney accuses the author and his publisher of knowingly printing salacious lies about the former GOP vice presidential candidate
Sarah Palin's lawyer is threatening to sue journalist Joe McGinniss and his publisher for "knowingly publishing false statements" in McGinnis' book The Rogue: Searching for the Real Sarah Palin, which was released last week. Attorney John Tiemessen says the book, which contains tales of adultery and cocaine use, is nothing but a collection of "tawdry gossip" intended to harm the Palins. Crown Publishing, a division of Random House, has not responded, nor has McGinniss. Would it be wise for Palin to take McGinniss and his publisher to court?
Absolutely. Palin should sue them: Random House has it coming, says Robert Stacy McCain at The Other McCain. "A journalist has to screw up pretty bad to lose a libel case," and McGinniss did just that by emailing Jesse Griffin — a rumor-mongering, Palin-bashing blogger — to say that he lacked sources to back up his most "salacious stories." You just don't publish that kind of garbage unless you are out to destroy someone's good name.
"Not a 'threat': Palin lawyer gives McGinniss, Random House legal notice"
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
No. Palin has better things to do: The urge to sue is understandable, says William A. Jacobson at Legal Insurrection, but it's extremely hard for a public figure to prove actual malice in a case like this. Besides, lawyers for Random House and McGinniss would get to grill Palin's family, friends, and political consultants. "Palin has better things to do. Like running for president, or if not, working to elect Republicans." And "if McGinniss is able to distract Palin from her goals, McGinniss will have accomplished far more than the smears in his book."
For Palin, there are risks either way: Some people might assume the smears are true if Palin doesn't sue, says Aaron Worthing at Patterico's Pontifications. But taking McGinniss to court might be riskier still. If the jury finds McGinniss' gossip is untrue but "not maliciously published," the anti-Palin media "might very well spin it as vindication" for Palin's stalker and his tawdry tales.
"Palinageddon!!! Sarah sicks (sic) her lawyers on Crown Publishing/Random House!"
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Political cartoons for January 18Cartoons Sunday’s political cartoons include cost of living, endless supply of greed, and more
-
Exploring ancient forests on three continentsThe Week Recommends Reconnecting with historic nature across the world
-
How oil tankers have been weaponisedThe Explainer The seizure of a Russian tanker in the Atlantic last week has drawn attention to the country’s clandestine shipping network
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred