No ‘grand bargain’ on the debt ceiling
Republicans rejected President Obama’s offer to forge a “grand bargain” that would cut $4 trillion from the deficit over 10 years.
What happened
Negotiations over raising the nation’s debt ceiling failed to break a partisan deadlock this week, as Republicans rejected President Obama’s offer to forge a “grand bargain” that would cut $4 trillion from the deficit over 10 years through spending cuts, Social Security and Medicare reform, and tax increases. House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) initially seemed open to Obama’s offer, but pulled out of talks last weekend when his caucus objected to raising about $1 trillion in new revenue over a decade by removing tax breaks for oil companies, corporate-jet owners, and hedge-fund managers. “Washington has a spending problem,” Boehner said. “We don’t have a revenue problem.” Republicans are now seeking a smaller deal to cut $2.5 trillion in spending without any revenue increases, but the president was holding out for a “big deal” to repair the nation’s long-term fiscal imbalance. “We might as well do it now, pull off the Band-Aid, eat our peas,” Obama said.
With no sign the impasse will be broken, Mitch McConnell, the Senate minority leader, proposed a “last-chance option” to stave off government default. His plan would give the president authority to raise the debt ceiling in three smaller increments over the course of the year, without congressional approval. That would put the burden of responsibility for raising the nation’s debt squarely on Obama. The president dismissed the offer as “partisan politics,” and warned that if Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling by Aug. 2, and the government goes into its first default in history, checks might not go out to recipients of Social Security, military pensions, and other government benefits.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What the editorials said
If you’re wondering who is responsible for this mess, said The Boston Globe, blame the voters. If either party “touches entitlements”—George W. Bush in 2006, congressional Democrats with Obama’s health-care-reform plan in 2010—they lose the following election, and the reckless spending goes on. And whenever a minority party takes a “strictly obstructionist” position, as the Republicans did last year, the voters reward them for it.
Obama’s “grand bargain” was a trap, said The Wall Street Journal. Obama claims he’s willing to cut entitlements, but he has taken what may be the costliest one of all—Obamacare—“off the table.” To pay for that Big Government boondoggle, Democrats snuck in $900 billion in new, health-care-related taxes over the next decade. And now Obama wants to add $1 trillion in additional taxes by closing so-called loopholes? Forget it.
What the columnists said
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
It’s become fashionable to say “both sides are equally at fault” for the deadlock, said Eugene Robinson in The Washington Post. “This is patently false.” Obama proposed around three dollars’ worth of budget cuts for every dollar of new revenue, and still Republicans rejected the offer. The GOP deserves the blame here, for taking the absurd position “that not a cent in new revenue can be raised,” even if it’s by closing loopholes for the richest Americans.
Clearly, “no deal is possible,” said John Podhoretz in CommentaryMagazine.com. That being the case, Republicans should embrace McConnell’s “fiendishly clever” proposal. It allows the GOP to claim responsibility for breaking the deadlock, and also to attack Obama for the ever-increasing debt ceiling right up until the 2012 elections. If it had been up to Boehner and Obama alone, said David Brooks in The New York Times, that big deal would have been possible. They both understand “you need bipartisan cover if you really want to cut spending” and reform entitlements and the tax code. Sadly, “they are bracketed on all sides” by partisan extremists who see politics as warfare.
It really is starting to look like a stalemate, said Ezra Klein in The Washington Post. With Republicans digging in their heels on tax increases, and Obama refusing to cut spending without some increase in revenues, only two developments can force someone to blink: “public fury arising out of a government shutdown, or a market panic arising out of near-default.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
The EEE virus is spreading in the US
The Explainer The mosquito strikes again
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The pros and cons of always having a credit freeze in place
The explainer Many people don't freeze their credit until their info gets exposed in a data breach — but you can also keep this protection in place before it happens
By Becca Stanek, The Week US Published
-
5 of the most invasive plant species in the world
Under the Radar Invasive plants threaten biodiversity
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
A brief history of third parties in the US
In Depth Though none of America's third parties have won a presidential election, they have nonetheless had a large impact on the country's politics
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Supreme Court rejects challenge to CFPB
Speed Read The court rejected a conservative-backed challenge to the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published