Why the Casey Anthony case proves American justice works
Anthony was rightfully acquitted, says Alan Dershowitz in The Wall Street Journal. It's not enough to believe that she killed her daughter. There has to be proof

Casey Anthony's acquittal on charges that she murdered her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee, was certainly unpopular, says Alan Dershowitz at The Wall Street Journal. But it was the right decision. For thousands of years, says the "legendary defense lawyer," Western society has stood by the principle that it is better for 10 guilty people to go free than it is for one innocent person to be imprisoned or put to death. Using this as its basis, our justice system seeks to do only one thing: Find undeniable proof that a defendant committed a crime. While we might like to think the Casey Anthony trial was about seeking justice for a slain child, it was actually about finding evidence that Anthony killed her. But "the evidence in this case left a reasonable doubt in the mind of all of the jurors." In cases like Anthony's, we have to accept that a legally just result "may not be the same as a morally just result." Justice may not have been found for Caylee, but the law prevailed. Here, an excerpt:
Casey Anthony was not found innocent of her daughter's murder, as many commentators seem to believe. She was found "not guilty." And therein lies much of the misunderstanding about the Anthony verdict....
The verdict in the Casey Anthony case reflected the lack of forensic evidence and heavy reliance on circumstantial inferences. There was no evidence of a cause of death, the time of death, or the circumstances surrounding the actual death of this young girl....
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A criminal trial is not about who is the better lawyer. It is about the evidence, and the evidence in this case left a reasonable doubt in the mind of all of the jurors. The system worked.
Read the entire article at The Wall Street Journal.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Brazil has a scorpion problem
Under The Radar Venomous arachnids are infesting country's fast-growing cities
-
Why Rikers Island will no longer be under New York City's control
The Explainer A 'remediation manager' has been appointed to run the infamous jail
-
California may pull health care from eligible undocumented migrants
IN THE SPOTLIGHT After pushing for universal health care for all Californians regardless of immigration status, Gov. Gavin Newsom's latest budget proposal backs away from a key campaign promise