Tim Pawlenty's hawkish attack on Obama's foreign policy

The GOP presidential hopeful tries to distinguish himself from his Republican rivals with tough talk. Will his sudden bluster help his fading campaign?

GOP presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty
(Image credit: Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty presented himself as the "leading hawk" in the GOP presidential field on Tuesday, accusing President Obama of turning his back on the pro-democracy activists leading the Arab Spring uprisings. Pawlenty also indirectly criticized his leading GOP rivals, many of whom are urging a swift withdrawal from Afghanistan, calling that a sign of "weakness." Instead, Pawlenty said, we should be intervening more directly in Libya, and ousting President Bashar al-Assad in Syria. Will Pawlenty's aggressive foreign policy proposals spark new interest in his flagging campaign? (Watch Pawlenty's criticism of Obama.)

No. Pawlenty is destroying his own credibility: His "hawkish" grandstanding is "so obviously untrue," says Daniel Larison at The American Conservative, "that it badly undermines Pawlenty's already limited credibility on this subject." His bluster might be a "welcome change if even one party were dedicated to prudence and restraint, but at the moment the leadership of both parties remains intent on recklessness and aggression."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up