Tim Pawlenty's hawkish attack on Obama's foreign policy

The GOP presidential hopeful tries to distinguish himself from his Republican rivals with tough talk. Will his sudden bluster help his fading campaign?

GOP presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty
(Image credit: Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty presented himself as the "leading hawk" in the GOP presidential field on Tuesday, accusing President Obama of turning his back on the pro-democracy activists leading the Arab Spring uprisings. Pawlenty also indirectly criticized his leading GOP rivals, many of whom are urging a swift withdrawal from Afghanistan, calling that a sign of "weakness." Instead, Pawlenty said, we should be intervening more directly in Libya, and ousting President Bashar al-Assad in Syria. Will Pawlenty's aggressive foreign policy proposals spark new interest in his flagging campaign? (Watch Pawlenty's criticism of Obama.)

No. Pawlenty is destroying his own credibility: His "hawkish" grandstanding is "so obviously untrue," says Daniel Larison at The American Conservative, "that it badly undermines Pawlenty's already limited credibility on this subject." His bluster might be a "welcome change if even one party were dedicated to prudence and restraint, but at the moment the leadership of both parties remains intent on recklessness and aggression."

"Pawlenty and diplomacy"

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.


Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Actually, this strong message will help Pawlenty: "Barack Obama is more distrustful of American power than any president since Jimmy Carter," says John Hinderaker at PowerLine. And "weariness with foreign policy has infected many Republicans, too." As such, Pawlenty has a lot to gain by defending America's right to lead, and staking out "a position as the inheritor of Ronald Reagan's foreign policy mantle." This was a "good speech," and Pawlenty deserves respect for grappling openly with such tough issues.

"Pawlenty backs American power"

Big talk doesn't make Pawlenty a leader: "It makes sense that Pawlenty would want to try to pass the 'Commander in Chief Test,'" says Steve Benen at Washington Monthly. "Unfortunately for him, he appears to have a long way to go." He gave a major address on the Middle East but barely mentioned America's two ongoing wars, in Iraq and Afghanistan. By dodging the real issues, Pawlenty only reinforced his image as a lightweight, which hardly did his campaign any favors.

"Pawlenty tries his hand at foreign policy"

Continue reading for free

We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.

Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.