Ft. Hood: Obama's 'flippant' speech
Conservatives say Obama's first words on the Fort Hood rampage lacked gravity. Fair assessment or expedient attack?

President Obama's first public comments about the Fort Hood killings — appended to a scheduled press conference at the Interior Department on Thursday — have triggered criticism from the right and comparisons to George W. Bush's decision to continue reading "The Pet Goat" to schoolchildren after being alerted that America was under attack on 9/11. Did Obama show poor judgment—or are conservatives protesting too much? (Watch Obama's first public comments about the Fort Hood killings)
Obama's approach was disturbingly flippant: It was surprising to watch the president give a hearty "shout out" to bureaucrats gathered for the conference before shifting into a more appropriate tone, says Linda Chavez in Commentary: "He treated the event like a pep rally, rather than a tragic occasion [for] a wider audience than those gathered in the room." Surely, I'm not the only one reminded of Bush's response to the 9/11 attacks.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The "Pet Goat" comparison is unfair...to George Bush: "You can debate if Bush should have immediately ran out on the kids and then made his speech," says Paul Cooper at News Real, "but there is no debating the strength of his first public words on the incident." Bush got right to the point, saying: "Freedom itself was attacked this morning by a faceless coward, and freedom will be defended."
"Obama's Ft. Hood reaction is far worse than the left's smear of Bush's 'pet goat' moment"
The comparison is strained at best: Likening this to Bush's "Pet Goat" moment "seems like a stretch," says Dan Amira at New York Magazine. "The 9/11 attacks were an ongoing threat, and required immediate action from the president to coordinate a military response. Every second he continued to read to children was a second without a commander-in-chief." By the time Obama spoke, the Fort Hood gunman had been neutralized. Obama's "offense [is] not much more than a failure of decorum."
"Was yesterday Obama's 'Pet Goat' moment?"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
It's Obama's critics who are showing disrespect: "Some conservatives are sure searching for a way to turn the shooting at Ford Hood into yet another way to attack Barack Obama," says Ron Chusid at Liberal Values. They fail to grasp "how disrespectful to the troops their sick attempts to play politics with this really are." Shame on them.
"Bizarre attacks on Obama's response to Fort Hood shootings."
........................................................
SEE THE WEEK'S FULL COVERAGE OF FORT HOOD:
• Fort Hood: The Al-Qaeda question
• Fort Hood: What the world is saying
• Sunday Talk Show Briefing: Religion's role in Fort Hood (Video)
• Fort Hood: Crime or terrorism?
• Who is Nidal Hasan: A timeline of the suspect's life
• What Kimberly Munley's heroism means
-
What should you be stockpiling for 'World War Three'?
In the Spotlight Britons advised to prepare after the EU tells its citizens to have an emergency kit just in case
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Carnivore diet: why people are eating only meat
The Explainer 'Meatfluencers' are taking social media by storm but experts warn meat-only diets have health consequences
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published