Obama's swine flu 'emergency'
Was Obama wise to declare H1N1 a national emergency -- or is he just "covering his behind"?
The White House is calling it a formality. For unconvinced right wing bloggers, it’s the first step in enacting martial law. Obama’s decision to declare the swine-flu outbreak a national emergency -- a move designed to expedite disaster plans should hospitals get overwhelmed -- has provoked feverish debate. Was the president’s declaration really necessary? (Watch coverage of Obama's H1N1 emergency declaration)
This isn’t just a formality: "The stakes just got raised with this proclamation," says James G. Hodge Jr., a health law and ethics professor at Arizona State University, quoted in The Washington Post. "Broader powers of the federal government are now authorized to respond to the emerging outbreak."
"Obama declares flu emergency to ease restrictions for hospitals"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
It sounds hysterical, but it’s the right call: Sure, some are terming this "fear-mongering," says James Joyner in Outside the Beltway. "And it’s true that this is neither 'epidemic' nor an 'emergency' in any ordinary sense...," but, regrettably, these are the alarmist words a President must invoke "to bypass the bureaucratic rules preventing faster dissemination of the vaccine."
"Obama Declares Swine Flu Emergency"
This is Obama’s Katrina and he’s just pre-empting criticism: Given the drastic shortfalls of the vaccine, says Boston Herald editor Jules Crittenden in his personal blog, people are already calling swine flu Obama’s Katrina: "When you have a disaster looming, you need to look like you’re doing something ... And when it’s over, everyone is going to want to know whether the president did everything he could to limit the damage." Sorry, but this is called "covering your behind."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
It’s a wise move, even if it will trigger anxiety: Obama’s decision was a cautious step, says Brian Walsh in Time, "not unlike declaring an emergency before a hurricane hits landfall." But given the government’s spotty response to the crisis so far, I’m not reassured. National vaccine shortages and freshly worried parents are a "recipe for confusion and frustration."
-
What should you be stockpiling for 'World War Three'?
In the Spotlight Britons advised to prepare after the EU tells its citizens to have an emergency kit just in case
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Carnivore diet: why people are eating only meat
The Explainer 'Meatfluencers' are taking social media by storm but experts warn meat-only diets have health consequences
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published