WWF's unwanted 9/11 ad
Why the wildlife conservation group might sue a Brazilian advertising firm
It's not a good idea to use Sept. 11 as an advertising theme, said Hamilton Nolan in Gawker. "It's really not." To understand why, consider the ad, titled "Tsunami," created by a Brazilian ad firm, DDB Brasil, depicting dozens of airliners flying toward lower Manhattan, while the World Trade Center twin towers are still standing. The ad was done on spec for the World Wildlife Fund, which understandably was not amused.
That's an understatement, said Ed Morrissey in Hot Air. The WWF condemned the ad, calling it "offensive and tasteless," and said it may sue DDB Brasil for releasing the ad—complete with a WWF logo displayed prominently at the top—without the wildlife conservation organization's permission. "Whoever thought of trivializing and commercializing the murders of 3,000 people for an ad campaign about conservation needs to search deep within themselves to determine whether their soul exists."
"Exploiting one tragedy to try to prevent another is just stupid and self-defeating," said David Gianatasio in AdFreak, "and will always backfire." The message in the ad was: "The tsunami killed 100 times more people than 9/11. The planet is brutally powerful. Respect it. Preserve it." But "respect is the main thing lacking" in this "tasteless, nightmarish print ad."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
WWF rejected the ad, said Jen Carlson in Gothamist, but DDB Brasil apparently entered it in the One Show competition, and won an award for public service. "Okay, so who wants to make a mock-up of 1,000 Nazi soldiers being catapulted into Thailand?"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why Turkey's Kurdish insurgents are laying down their arms
Under the Radar The PKK said its aims can now be 'resolved through democratic politics'
-
Book reviews: 'Girl on Girl: How Pop Culture Turned a Generation of Women Against Themselves' and 'Notes to John'
Feature The aughts' toxic pop culture and Joan Didion's most private pages
-
The FDA plans to embrace AI agencywide
In the Spotlight Rumors are swirling about a bespoke AI chatbot being developed for the FDA by OpenAI
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy