Sparring over tax cuts
Republican presidential front-runners Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney are challenging each other's tax-cutting credentials. This is a good sign for fiscal conservatives, said Collin Levy in The Wall Street Journal. Except, said David Brooks in The New York
What happened
Republican presidential front-runners Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney continued sparring on the campaign trail Thursday after challenging each other’s tax-cutting credentials in this week’s GOP debate on economics. Romney criticized Giuliani for opposing a federal line-item veto intended to help cut spending. Giuliani has said Romney should have given taxpayers relief when he was governor of “Taxachusetts.”
What the commentators said
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
This campaign is full of surprises, said Collin Levy in The Wall Street Journal. “It's a good year for supply-siders when a former New York mayor and a former Massachusetts governor are going mano a mano over who is the baddest tax cutter east of the Mississippi.” Both candidates have “good but imperfect tax records,” so economic conservatives will have to choose carefully if they want a president with the will to fight a Democratic Congress for tax cuts.
Actually, the entire Republican Party has “abandoned” much of its traditional economic turf, said David Brooks in The New York Times (free registration). “Instead, this ground is being seized by a Democrat,” Hillary Clinton, who proposed first a tax credit for college and now “a plan to give families down the income scale access to 401(k)-style plans.” Where are the GOP proposals to help the “middle-class dreamer who longs to make good”?
Please, the GOP’s turf is safe from Clinton, said Charles Hurt in the New York Post (free registration). When President Bush proposed “diverting” a small portion of Social Security taxes into “private accounts where the feds could no longer steal it,” Clinton vowed to fight to—her words—“bury the idea.” It’s hard to take her seriously now when she says she has a plan to protect people from the day when “Social Security checks turn to rubber.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Israel’s E1 zone in the West Bank: the death of the two-state solution?The Explainer Controversial new settlement in occupied territories makes future Palestinian state unviable, critics claim
-
What the new Making Tax Digital rules meanThe Explainer A new system will be introduced from April to overhaul how untaxed income is reported to HMRC
-
The former largest iceberg is turning blue. It’s a bad sign.Under the radar It is quickly melting away
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred