The weirdest omission of the Democratic debate
And you'll never believe what the moderators focused on instead...
Earlier this month in Paris, a historic accord on climate change obtained the assent of 195 countries. It will not in itself solve one of the most pressing problems facing the world, but it's a major first step. To the journalists who moderated last weekend's Democratic debate, however, it might as well not have happened. And what's even worse than the questions that weren't asked are the ones that were.
Elizabeth Kolbert's recent article about climate change and its effects on Miami makes the stakes of the issue crystal clear. "The amount of water on the planet is fixed (and has been for billions of years)," Kolbert observes. "Its distribution, however, is subject to all sorts of rearrangements." If climate change continues unabated, much of the city will be underwater before the end of the century — and it will hardly be the only case. Seems like a pretty big deal, right?
And despite the importance of the issue, it's one of the countless issues on which the two major American parties are polarized. Among Democrats, the only question is how to address climate change. Republicans, conversely, argue either that climate change is a fiction invented by communist scientists or an inevitability it would be futile to stop (and sometimes both at the same time.) Which president will be staffing the EPA and determining environmental regulations for the next four years is, therefore, a rather big deal.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But you'd never know it from Saturday's debates — despite the Paris agreement putting the spotlight on the issue, moderators ignored it entirely. But at the debate's nadir, moderator Martha Raddatz did find time for this question:
Your city might be about to drown, but your agents in the press think you're more interested in some sexist twaddle about a potential presidential spouse. Not to be outdone, David Muir followed up with Bernie Sanders, asking if his wife Jane would "have a desk close by in the West Wing." Admittedly, confining the presidential spouse questions to Clinton would have made them seem even more sexist than they were, but really.
And while that was the low point of the debate, ABC's moderators generally delivered a dreadful performance. In addition to many poorly-chosen questions, they were also aggressive at intervening if it looked like a discussion between the candidates might get too interesting or substantive.
And it's not as if climate change was the only issue the moderators deemed unworthy of the attention they granted to pressing subjects like who will be responsible for White House floral arrangements. To take one example, by the time the next president is midway between his or her first term, four members of the Supreme Court will have had their 80th birthday. Within the next decade, the median vote of the Supreme Court will be considerably more conservative or more liberal than it is now, which would have major implications for countless issues. This might seem like an important issue to bring up — but not to the people moderating the debate.
And one reason the Supreme Court is likely to be in the spotlight during the next campaign is that next June it will either have restricted the ability of states like Texas to use questionable regulations to close abortion clinics or it will have effectively overruled Roe v. Wade. Reproductive freedom is another major issue on which the parties have polarized positions, and the autonomy of American women is one of the many crucial issues at stake in the 2016 elections. Hillary Clinton referred to Planned Parenthood — which federal Republicans are trying to get defunded — multiple times, but moderators considered the issue beneath their notice.
Whatever their other flaws, the Republican debates have at least mostly involved substantive questions (if not follow-ups) from moderators. But the Democratic debate too often saw a retreat to the once-common practice of journalists focusing on trivial questions of no discernible interest to anyone but themselves. With what's at stake in the upcoming elections, watchers and voters deserve better.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Scott Lemieux is a professor of political science at the College of Saint Rose in Albany, N.Y., with a focus on the Supreme Court and constitutional law. He is a frequent contributor to the American Prospect and blogs for Lawyers, Guns and Money.
-
'A direct, protracted war with Israel is not something Iran is equipped to fight'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 17, 2024
Cartoons Wednesday's cartoons - political anxiety, jury sorting hat, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Arid Gulf states hit with year's worth of rain
Speed Read The historic flooding in Dubai is tied to climate change
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published