Hillary Clinton's cargo cult economics
The Democratic frontrunner promises a return to '90s prosperity. But she seems to have no realistic plan to get us there.
The Bill Clinton '90s sure look better in retrospect, don't they? Especially when you compare them with the last decade and a half of awesome American failures: the dot-com bubble, the Supreme Court installing George W. Bush, 9/11, the failed invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the 2008 financial crisis, and the extremely weak recovery that followed. Even the penny-ante scandals of the Clinton days make one nostalgic. Remember when presidents had tawdry affairs instead of torture regimes or assassination programs for American citizens?
Hillary Clinton is, unsurprisingly, attempting to coast on some of that '90s nostalgia, running as a "growth Democrat," according to a New York Times article quoting many high-level Clinton supporters.
Attempting to resurrect the growth and high wages of the Clinton days is all well and good. But while much about the '90s was positive, the decade was also plagued by the manifest failures of Bill Clinton's economic policy. There is little evidence that Hillary Clinton has grappled with those failures, or even with what lay behind her husband's successes. Nor does she seem to have rigorously questioned whether the economy might have evolved such that simply trying to repeat history might not work.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Merely imitating the forms and language of the old Clinton administration is about as likely to work as cargo cults' wooden airplanes were to restart contact with Western societies.
But first, the good of the Clinton years. The strong '90s economy, particularly the red-hot labor market of the late decade, is probably best characterized as a happy accident. A productivity boom driven by the adoption of computer technology met a conservative Federal Reserve chairman who for once did not react to rising wages by crushing them with tight money. All that was heated further by a stock bubble which sloshed money out into the broader economy.
To be sure, Bill Clinton deserves some credit. Raising taxes on the rich and boosting the earned income tax credit as he did might have ameliorated the effects of inequality on aggregate demand. Even simple stewardship is an important part of government — just allowing it to happen (and not, say, panicking about hypothetical future inflation) was important and worthwhile.
But it wasn't all good. Financial deregulation (a bipartisan affair in those days) turned out to have some nasty side effects. NAFTA's results were mixed at best. Worst of all, Clinton's heralded welfare reform turned out to be a grim failure. The true disaster of that policy was camouflaged somewhat by the brief '90s boom, but by now its full effects are obvious: a 150 percent increase in extreme poverty.
Finally, there's the issue of general economic structure. The '90s boom took hold fairly easily. But since then, the economy has sickened dramatically: Inequality has increased, the quality of jobs has decreased, the labor share of income has plummeted. Seven years after the 2008 crash, we're still missing about three points of prime-age employment (or about four million jobs).
If I were trying to summon the Ghost of the '90s Economy, I would do three things. First, do everything possible to stop the Federal Reserve from strangling the current recovery in its crib. Janet Yellen is taking steps to do just that, with the recent hike in interest rates. She was appointed to a five-year term in 2014, but she could still be asked to account why the Fed has not met its inflation target for the past three straight years (evidence the Fed could have done more for employment). What's more, there are still two open seats on the Fed's board of governors, which could be filled by monetary stimulus advocates at the earliest opportunity.
Second, I would admit the failure of welfare reform and design a replacement policy. Globalization is largely a fait accompli, but it would be extremely easy to knock together a new welfare program to attack poverty, perhaps starting with total abolishment of child poverty. This would be an economic good in itself (as well as striking a huge blow against racism and sexism), and also juice overall aggregate demand.
Third, I would address general economic sickness — essentially, inequality writ large. Run the economy as hot as possible, ratchet down corporate profits, help unions, and buttress the welfare state for those who are unable to work.
Is Hillary Clinton doing any of those things? Not really.
She's got some halfway decent policy on the third point, including some small new tax credits, a bit of infrastructure spending, raising the minimum wage, and a moderate pro-union package. But that's about it. Her economy page on her website does not even mention welfare or monetary policy.
The lack of repentance on welfare reform is morally outrageous. But it's the lack of attention to monetary policy that is least excusable on her own terms. Most of her economic platform revolves around trying to boost wages and juice job creation — but the Federal Reserve has the power to undo any such policy. If she passes an economic stimulus agenda, and the Fed simply raises rates to compensate, the result will be bupkis.
Simply standing back and hoping for a repeat of Bill Clinton's second term is unlikely to work. President Obama has been effectively forced to do just that, and the economic results are mediocre at best. Without a firm accounting of why the last four presidential terms have been so disappointing for the median family, Clinton's appeal to her husband's record is little more than cargo cult economics.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
'A speaker courageous enough to stand up to the extremists in his own party'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
How could the Supreme Court's Fischer v. US case impact the other Jan 6. trials including Trump's?
Today's Big Question A former Pennsylvania cop might hold the key to a major upheaval in how the courts treat the Capitol riot — and its alleged instigator
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 18, 2024
Cartoons Thursday's cartoons - impeachment Peanuts, record-breaking temperatures, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published