Rand Paul got crushed in Iowa. But greatness is still within his reach.
You don't have to be president to be an effective champion of civil liberties


Rand Paul could have been a contender. Instead, after a distant fifth-place finish in Monday's Iowa caucuses, he looks like a mere also-ran in the 2016 presidential race.
The promise of Rand 2016 was great. By building on his father's libertarian base, but shearing it of the elder Paul's crankishness and softening himself up a little bit, Rand would reshape the Republican Party, and the country. In this vision, the GOP could have become a more libertarian party, holding on to most of its evangelical base while attracting more minorities and young voters. By playing up "free-market populism" — and railing against the nexus between big business and Washington — the Kentucky senator might have appealed to down-on-their-luck white voters without Trump-like xenophobia. The result of all this could have been a very different GOP, a winning presidential coalition, and, eventually, a changed country.
I'm no libertarian. But there's still a lot for me to like in this vision. On the economic side, the Republican Party needs to have it kicked into its head that being the party of free enterprise is not the same thing as being the party of big business. And while I'm a hawk on foreign policy, the GOP does need a useful realist corrective to a vision that only has the hammer of foreign intervention to hit every nail. Most importantly, the GOP is all too often quite cavalier about the dramatically important issue of civil liberties, and the imperial presidency.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Perhaps we'll never know whether a savvier, more charismatic libertarian than Rand Paul could have seized this potential and reshaped the GOP. Triangulating between libertarian positions and mainstream Republican positions is hard. To wit: By highlighting his opposition to high taxes and foreign aid, Paul made himself sound like every other Republican. And, like so many ideologues, he often came off as a petulant lecturer, rather than the happy warriors who build winning coalitions.
Rand Paul tried to please both libertarians and the Republican heartland. He might have won both. Instead, he lost both.
But don't forget: Rand Paul isn't just a candidate for president. He's also the junior senator from the great state of Kentucky. It's easy to forget sometimes that the Senate isn't just a launching pad to the presidency, but that it actually occasionally produces legislation, and that senators can be influential lawmakers, especially when they've been around the place for a long time.
Through his long decades in the Senate, Ted Kennedy amassed a more consequential legacy than his brother who was president. Indeed, lawmakers like Ted Kennedy, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, and Jim DeMint have had more influence on the Republic than many presidents. The Senate still produces widely influential statesmen, and Rand Paul has shown much greater skill at handling Senate politics than presidential politics. Unlike his father, he is not congenitally opposed to deal-making.
The Senate might actually be the best place for someone like Rand Paul to advance the cause of liberty. If he stays for many terms, accumulates seniority, inches his way up committees, and influences and moves legislation, he could become one of the most important people in Washington. The case for, say, greater civil liberties in spying programs, or criminal justice reform, needn't be advanced through presidential campaigns alone. It will take many years of debate and of legislative blocking and tackling. Rand could be this country's great champion of civil liberties — and he could do it all from the Senate.
Rand Paul clearly won't be president, at least not this time around. But he might still write his name in the history books as a great statesman.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry is a writer and fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. His writing has appeared at Forbes, The Atlantic, First Things, Commentary Magazine, The Daily Beast, The Federalist, Quartz, and other places. He lives in Paris with his beloved wife and daughter.
-
Help! Do we really need four Beatles biopics?
Talking Point The cast of Sam Mendes' Beatles biopics has been announced
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Test driving the Rolls-Royce Spectre Black Badge
The Week Recommends We take the most powerful Rolls-Royce ever built for a spin in Barcelona
By Fergus Scholes Published
-
Tuberculosis is seeing a resurgence, and it's only going to get worse
Under the radar The spread of the deadly infection is buoyed by global unrest
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published