Why I'm rooting for a Ted Cruz-Bernie Sanders general election

We could all do a lot worse this year. And we probably will.

Cruz vs. Sanders.
(Image credit: Joe Raedle/Getty Images, Win McNamee/Getty Images)

A boy can dream. And I'm dreaming of a Ted Cruz-Bernie Sanders matchup in November.

I know, I know. It's unlikely. But it's not impossible. And it's the anticlimax American needs to regain a little perspective.

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Now, Sanders and Cruz can't just sit back and wait to win on a second ballot. Particularly on the GOP side, a supposed white knight could still ride in to "save" the party. But party bigs must understand that spurning Sanders and Cruz voters will come with painful consequences — in November and beyond.

None of which is to say that Cruz-Sanders is likely. But dreams are about the possible. And I shouldn't be the only one dreaming about these two unlikely candidates facing off.

A President Cruz or a President Sanders would be historically weak. Democrats would gripe that Sanders wouldn't be able to offset Republicans' advantage in Congress and statehouses nationwide; Republicans would complain that Cruz would lack the mainstream magnetism to enlarge the GOP tent. And the critics would be right! But they'd be missing the bigger picture: At the same time as President Sanders or Cruz would gratify our insurgent impulses without letting them run amok, they would also serve as a stark reminder to the party establishments that America isn't best off with a superstar in the White House.

That's right: Clinton and Trump are so hard to stomach in significant part because of how huge of celebrities they are — and how that fact defines their view of power. It's not just that they're ubiquitous, smack in the public eye for generations. They don't want to govern through coalition-building or shot selection — they want to consummate their ambitions in a political Super Bowl halftime show of personal greatness.

Contrast that with Cruz and Sanders. In the first case, we have an inescapably dorky man whose unglamorous style and look pairs oddly with the fact that he's actually a relative rookie. In the second, a rumpled holdover from a bygone era that predates celebrity as we know it. Neither of these men look particularly presidential. Neither of them have a face or demeanor made to dominate the news. They both break the pattern we've come to expect from the national elite — whether in its ruthlessly scripted Clintonian form or its ruthlessly unscripted Trumpian one. In that sense, both Cruz and Sanders offer a sort of forced moment of zen for members of both parties (or neither party). Two sharp, articulate, dogged guys, square pegs in round holes, clearly contrasting on the issues, but too constrained by political reality to suffer delusions of grandeur.

We could all do a lot worse this year. And even though we probably will, I'm not quite ready to give up the dream.

James Poulos is a contributing editor at National Affairs and the author of The Art of Being Free, out January 17 from St. Martin's Press. He has written on freedom and the politics of the future for publications ranging from The Federalist to Foreign Policy and from Good to Vice. He fronts the band Night Years in Los Angeles, where he lives with his son.