The Democrats have a 'crying wolf' problem
Donald Trump is really, really, really bad. But Democrats have been saying that about Republicans for years.


He's a racist! He's a demagogue! He's authoritarian! His presidency could deliver a fatal blow to the Constitution!
This is all true of Donald Trump. The problem is, Democrats have been saying it's true of nearly every prominent Republican for the past 30 years.
Perhaps most famously and recently, the George W. Bush administration sent the left into fits of hystrionics. At one point, more than half of Democrats believed that Bush knew about 9/11 in advance. But today, warnings that Dick Cheney's obsession with secrecy, Bush's firings of U.S. attorneys, and the CIA torture program would put an end to American democracy look laughably quaint. President Obama's abuses of executive power, from the secret kill list to the legislation-rewriting executive orders, go well beyond anything Bush could have dreamed up.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But the "Republicans as racists" trope is the one that really persists. The 2012 headline "Romney Accused of Racism Following NAACP Speech" is a good representative example of the genre. It's one of those things that is inevitable: like summer rain, sunsets, taxes, and left-wing virtue signaling. You don't even have to read the article.
This isn't new. As National Review's Jonah Goldberg points out, "In 1944, Franklin Roosevelt told the country that if Republicans were returned to power, 'even though we shall have conquered our enemies on the battlefields abroad, we shall have yielded to the spirit of fascism here at home.' The press nodded along." The spirit of fascism. Just that.
Don't get me wrong. Of course, in politics, all sides are guilty of exaggerated claims and unfair attacks. But there's a particular tendency on the left to portray opponents as not just wrong but evil, and in a unique way. It's an offshoot of Krauthammer's Second Law that "conservatives think liberals are misguided; liberals think conservatives are evil." This bizarre tic explains, or perhaps is explained by, the finding that conservatives understand liberal positions better than liberals understand conservative positions.
But here's the key point in this Clinton vs. Trump matchup: Democrats' long history of crying wolf poses a unique problem in this cycle. Several distinguished speakers at the Democratic National Convention maintained that this election is "not about left or right," but about something more fundamental, because Trump reflects something uniquely corrosive to American democracy. As a #NeverTrump conservative, I fully agree with them! But too many liberals have been saying exactly this sort of thing about all sorts of other Republicans for an awfully long time. The words have lost their sting.
If your movement — even if it's often only the fringes of your movement — calls George W. Bush a racist, claims that Mitt Romney is a "severe danger," and assails John McCain as an "unstable, hot-headed liar" who is "unfit to be president," is it any wonder that many Americans are skeptical when you warn of the dangers of Trump? Why should we trust you this time? You've cried wolf too many times before.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry is a writer and fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. His writing has appeared at Forbes, The Atlantic, First Things, Commentary Magazine, The Daily Beast, The Federalist, Quartz, and other places. He lives in Paris with his beloved wife and daughter.
-
Bombs or talks: What’s next in the US-Iran showdown?
Talking Points US gives Tehran a two month deadline to deal
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Inside the contested birth years of generations
The Explainer Battles over where Gen Z ends and Gens Alpha and Beta begin remain unsettled
By David Faris Published
-
Art review: Jack Whitten: The Messenger
Feature Museum of Modern Art, New York City, through Aug. 2
By The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published