Will tonight's presidential debate be another national embarrassment?
May our children forgive us


The final debate before the 2016 presidential election is tonight. It will be moderated by Fox News' Chris Wallace, who has promised to ask the candidates about social programs and the national debt, immigration, the economy, the Supreme Court, and "fitness to be president." In a different election year, this might make for a real yawner. Not tonight!
Here's what to watch for this evening.
The overwhelming background is Donald Trump's ongoing meltdown. He's been slammed by a seemingly endless series of allegations of sexual assault (as has been seen in other contexts, there is usually a pattern of behavior). So far 10 women have now either levied new assault claims or brought attention to old ones.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In response, he has lashed out at virtually everyone. He's attacking the GOP leadership for disloyalty. He's attacking Hillary Clinton with utterly fabricated claims about voter fraud and sundry other conspiracy theories, many of them palpably anti-Semitic. The sheer bile and hatred unleashed by Trump as he goes down in flames, attempting to pin the blame for his onrushing defeat on anyone but himself, has crowded out virtually all other political discussion — and indeed most other news in general.
Previous debates had some amount of this, but none has happened since the full deluge of accusations. Trump's history is sure to come up during the debate, and he is sure to say more deranged things in response. His anti-Muslim and anti-Latino bigotry are sure to make an appearance during this debate, as they did in the previous ones.
However, the section on Trump's past might be relatively restrained. Wallace is a conservative, and is probably none too keen to see the Republican standard-bearer beclown himself and his party even more. More importantly, Clinton probably will not press the attack very hard. She is congenitally cautious to a fault, and has repeatedly shown a preference to let Trump hang himself rather than get in an argument that might make her look bad — especially when she has a comfortable lead in the polls, as she does now.
So I expect to hear more of two things, both of which have barely been mentioned in the campaign thus far.
The first is austerity, which has gotten passing but not sustained attention in the presidential debates (though the vice-presidential one was heavily austerian). Elite Washington is saturated in an ideology which declares that budget cuts are by definition good, especially ones that cut social benefits for ordinary citizens. That perspective, funded by hundreds of millions of dollars in agitprop from ultra-rich people like Pete Peterson, has rather fallen by the wayside as the economy has recovered and Trump has dominated the coverage. But the pressure is endless — as seen by the moderator of the vice-presidential debate outsourcing her questions about the budget to one of Peterson's front groups. Wallace will no doubt press this issue, and both candidates can be expected to accept the austerian frame that budget balancing is always good and any new programs must be "paid for," though of course Trump's proposals are not remotely close.
The second is the Supreme Court. Antonin Scalia is still dead, and his seat is still being held open by Senate Republicans, who refuse to grant a vote on President Obama's nominee of Merrick Garland. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) recently let slip what everyone is taking for granted — that Senate Republicans will block any nominee a Democrat makes, if they possibly can. He later walked it back, but it's still very obviously what they will do if they can keep control of the Senate. If they lose the Senate, then Democrats will just as obviously quickly abolish the filibuster for Supreme Court nominations so they can fill the seat.
I honestly don't know where the candidates might go on this one. Would Trump nominate his buddy Peter Thiel to the court, so he can rubber-stamp a new rich-friendly libel law and start suing newspapers? Will Clinton re-nominate Garland — or perhaps Barack Obama? I'll be interested to find out.
Overall, I'm expecting another night of utter, utter depravity and extensive national embarrassment. If you're the praying sort, this might be a good time to beg for mercy for the United States.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Scientists invent a solid carbon-negative building material
Under the radar Building CO2 into the buildings
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Scottish hospitality shines at these 7 hotels
The Week Recommends Sleep well at these lovely inns across Scotland
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: April 1, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published