Donald Trump just pulled off the greatest scam in American history
And the marks bet their future on it
Having spent a good portion of the last year and a half documenting, exploring, and considering the depths of Donald Trump's depravity, I confess that at times I wondered whether there was much point to it all. Sure, he was an interesting character — even if he lacked the kind of moral and intellectual complexity that would make for a truly compelling villain — but if what everyone assumed would happen did indeed happen and he went down to an emphatic defeat, what was it all for? Yes, Trump as a phenomenon was still vitally important for what it told us about our politics, our media, and our society. But as an individual person, how much would his quirks and pathologies really matter in the end?
Well things look rather different today, don't they?
Trump's supporters will say that nobody thought this was possible because everyone doing the predicting was a coastal elitist out of touch with the heartland folk who pushed him to an Electoral College victory. But the truth is that no one involved in politics — Republican, Democrat, or otherwise — predicted he would win. The only people who claimed he would were in the employ of the Trump campaign, and even they didn't seem to believe it when they said it.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
There are a hundred explanations for what happened on Tuesday, and it will take a good deal of time to sort them all out. But I'm sure many on the right will gleefully compare the shock among Democrats to what happened to Republicans in 2012, when they were convinced that Mitt Romney was headed for victory. The difference is that four years ago, Republicans refused to believe what the polls were telling them, and the polls were largely right. This year, Democrats believed what the polls were telling them, and they were largely wrong. Though perhaps not as wrong as you might think — the margins were small but persistent, and they all pointed in the same direction, and as of this writing it appears that Clinton will have won more votes.
But now, Donald Trump's personal quirks will matter a great deal. An ample majority of the public has thought all along that Trump has neither the qualifications nor the temperament to be president — yet millions of people believed that about him and voted for him anyway. And they'll find out what they were voting for.
In modern history we've never seen a president who was less a creature of his party, and for many of Trump's supporters that was a big part of the attraction. But what they may not have realized is that when they bought Trump, they'll be getting the GOP and its agenda as part of the deal.
How many of those working-class whites are on Medicaid, or use subsidies to get health coverage from the Affordable Care Act? They can kiss that goodbye. Were they hoping for a big tax cut? Sorry, when congressional Republicans write their tax-cutting bill it'll be the wealthy who reap the benefits. Hope they're ready for some new restrictions on abortion, and more pollution in their communities, and fewer rights on the job, because all that's coming too.
And if they think Trump will put the brakes on it, they've got another thing coming, because the most important thing to understand about Donald Trump when it comes to policy is, he just doesn't care. His ignorance is matched by his indifference. He didn't get this far by reading briefing books and having a grasp of how government works.
And that's where his personality matters: It will allow Republicans to go hog-wild on legislation, while he spends his time... well, doing something or other, it's not quite clear. The area of most profound danger is in foreign policy, where the president has the greatest latitude to act on his own and where Trump's pettiness, his vindictiveness, his stupidity, and his impulsiveness could lead to outright catastrophe, and not the slow and steady catastrophe of Republican economic and social policy, but the kind of quick and dramatic catastrophe in which large numbers of people wind up suddenly dead.
But Trump voters aren't worried. They are sure President Trump will convince the Chinese to give us back our jobs, and bring back coal and steel, and roll back the last half-century of social progress. And then there'll be so much winning, we'll get tired of winning.
Eventually they'll wind up like the marks he took in with Trump University — taken in by the flash of golden cufflinks and the power of his celebrity, they'll eventually figure out that it was all a scam. But by the time they do, the damage will be done.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
Judge rejects Elon Musk's $56B pay package again
Speed Read Judge Kathaleen McCormick upheld her rejection of the Tesla CEO's unprecedented compensation deal
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
French government poised to fall amid budget fight
Speed Read Far-right and leftist opposition parties both filed motions of no confidence against Prime Minister Michel Barnier
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Biden arrives in Angola for historic Africa visit
Speed Read The president intends to strengthen U.S. ties with Africa and counter China's dominance in the region
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published