Why Republicans won't be punished for recklessly destroying ObamaCare
Recent politics has been one long arc of Republicans being rewarded at the ballot box for risky behavior. Why will this time be different?
Now that Republicans control the government, it's widely assumed they will "own" the adverse effects of repealing ObamaCare without an adequate replacement.
Stalwart Never Trump-er Jennifer Rubin, for instance, writes: "Rather than be an 'easy' win early in the new president's term, it may turn into a knock-down-drag-out fight, or even a punt to delay action. What sounds good in a campaign ad or a white paper often becomes much more problematic when facing the consequences of such a monumental about-face in health-care policy."
Sounds reasonable, right? As President Obama himself notes, a large chunk of those who gained access to health insurance through the Affordable Care Act are the same working-class whites who buoyed Trump's Electoral College victory. Strip these voters of their health-care plans and face their wrath: If I'm honest with myself, I'd make the same assumption.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Yet as the annus horribilis known as 2016 reaches its sad conclusion, we should instead ask ourselves: Why, of all times, would Republicans begin compromising now? If your party just pulled one of the unlikeliest inside-straights in the history of American politics, wouldn't you feel emboldened rather than cautious?
Consider. Donald Trump's run for the presidency was, on its face, a textbook example of how not to conduct a national campaign. He mired himself in nonrelevant personal vendettas. He lost all three debates. He demonstrated throughout a total lack of preparation and knowledge of public policy. He alienated the senior leadership of his own party, one member of which chastised him for making a "racist comment." He was revealed to have boasted about committing sexual assault with impunity. You know the story: He won anyway. LOL Nothing Matters.
If such an improbable feat owes more to Donald Trump's demagogic appeal among white voters whom "neoliberalism" left behind, consider, too, that embattled conservative Republican senators like Wisconsin's Ron Johnson and Pennsylvania's Pat Toomey outpolled Trump on Election Day. Such Republicans performed better than expected — just as they did in 2014, when Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) was nearly upset by GOP challenger Ed Gillespie, and when Gov. Sam Brownback of Kansas, who, despite wrecking his state's finances, defied expectations and easily won reelection. And just as they did in 2013, when Ken Cuccinelli, then the attorney general of Virginia whose social conservatism seemed wildly out of step with the state's growing population of minorities and college-educated whites, nearly upset Terry McAuliffe in a closely-contested gubernatorial race. The reason for the razor-thin margin? You guessed it — ObamaCare.
With the exception of Obama's reelection, the politics of 2009 to the present has been one long arc of Republicans being rewarded at the ballot box despite massively resisting compromise with the president, blocking judicial and executive appointments, and unnecessarily contriving fiscal crises.
Why will this time be different?
Because, you say, ObamaCare has, for all its problems, delivered material benefits — and those benefits won't be eliminated or reduced without a fight. "Look, the Affordable Care Act benefits a huge number of Trump voters," Obama said in a podcast with former senior aide David Axelrod. "There are a lot of folks in places like West Virginia or Kentucky who didn't vote for Hillary, didn't vote for me, but are being helped by this."
Let's look at Kentucky, since the president brought it up. Republicans just won control of its legislature for the first time since 1920. And last year, it elected as governor the Tea Party outsider Matt Bevin, who had campaigned on a promise to roll back the state's seemingly successful ObamaCare health exchange. Now, it's true that dislodging the core elements of the Affordable Care Act has proved to be a thorny task, as it may for the Trump administration and congressional Republicans next year.
But the point here is about permission structure. If Republicans were mice in a maze, the politics of polarization and white identitarianism has rewarded them handsomely at nearly every turn. If they face backlash, they have the cushion of favorable midterm Senate map in 2018 and a House majority that is likely safe until 2020. The GOP thus has good reason to shoot for the moon on ObamaCare, taxes, and entitlement reform.
Rubin may be right that Republicans face a "knock-down-drag-out fight" over ObamaCare. But if that happens, don't expect voters to punish them for it — or for anything — anytime soon.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Scott Galupo is a freelance writer living in Virginia. In addition to The Week, he blogs for U.S. News and reviews live music for The Washington Post. He was formerly a senior contributor to the American Conservative and staff writer for The Washington Times. He was also an aide to Rep. John Boehner. He lives with his wife and two children and writes about politics to support his guitar habit.
-
Why more and more adults are reaching for soft toys
Under The Radar Does the popularity of the Squishmallow show Gen Z are 'scared to grow up'?
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Magazine solutions - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine printables - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published