Trump is about to sabotage the GOP on tax cuts
It's health care all over again
When Republicans originally got behind Donald Trump, they figured that it wouldn't much matter that he wasn't remotely conversant with the details of public policy. He could sit in the Oval Office tweeting about how America was becoming Great Again, while the experienced and knowledgeable GOP members of Congress, under the wise and firm guidance of Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell, would write the bills, pass them through both houses, and send them on to the White House for a signature. So much winning, and everybody wins.
But when they set about tackling their first big legislative priority — repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act — they found that Trump had an ability, and perhaps even an eagerness, to sabotage them at every turn, even if it wasn't clear he realized it. And now it's about to happen to them all over again.
It sometimes appears that Trump would be happier if the presidency was just a figurehead position, like king of Spain or grand marshal of the Rose Parade. Indeed, he may have thought that's what it was; after 100 days on the job, he confessed that he was surprised to learn that being president of the world's leading military, economic, and cultural superpower was somewhat more complicated than running a brand-licensing business. "This is more work than in my previous life," he told an interviewer. "I thought it would be easier."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Given all the strain, he wasn't going to be bothered reading briefing books and boning up on white papers; according to one report, National Security Council officials learned that in the documents they gave him it was necessary to repeat his name in "as many paragraphs as we can because he keeps reading if he's mentioned." But that doesn't mean he won't be called upon for his thoughts when key policy changes are being debated. And that's where the trouble starts.
Republicans had a difficult task in the ACA repeal, which is that they had to get the public to buy a version of health care that would be much less generous than the status quo. Their philosophy demanded that the government step back from providing insurance and subsidies, which would necessarily be painful; the promise of a better future fueled by the wondrous magic of the free market might sound good in the abstract, but it's not quite as appealing when it means you just lost your insurance.
But instead of using his unmatched megaphone to make the case for this change, every time Trump opened his mouth he seemed to promise more government, more benefits, a gentler embrace from Washington, D.C. "We're going to have insurance for everybody," he said, no doubt sending Paul Ryan rushing to reread his dog-eared copy of Atlas Shrugged for comfort.
It was an echo of the rhetoric he used during the campaign, not just on health care but much more broadly. "I will give you everything," he said. "I will give you what you've been looking for for 50 years." It's not a message that fits well with a party that would rather smack you across the face and tell you to pull yourself up by your bootstraps, and it left Republicans with the leader of their own party making promises they had no intention of keeping.
Now history is repeating itself as they prepare to launch an effort to cut taxes on corporations and the wealthy. Trump is shooting his mouth off again, telling reporters this week, "The rich will not be gaining at all with this plan." Even though the plan has not been issued yet, everybody knows the rich will be gaining quite a bit. He even suggested that the rich might get their taxes increased: "I think the wealthy will be pretty much where they are ... If they have to go higher, they'll go higher." Yet the chances that Republicans will raise taxes on the wealthy are precisely zero. When the administration released a brief outline of its plan earlier this year, the Tax Policy Center ran the numbers and determined that those in the top 1 percent were in for an average tax cut of $271,340, while those in the top one-tenth of 1 percent would get an average cut of $1.4 million.
To most Republicans, that's just as it should be — justice demands that those noble job creators be relieved of the terrible burden of taxation. But now that Trump has said what he said, they'll all be confronted by reporters asking, "The president said your plan wouldn't cut taxes for the wealthy. So how do you explain what it actually does?" Squirming will ensue.
Why does Trump do this? As much as he's focused on pleasing his base and lashing out at anyone who criticizes him, he also has a deep need for approval. In the moment, he's likely to say whatever he thinks will please whoever he's talking to. He wants smiles and nods, good press coverage, the affirmation of everyone around him. And since he has no firm conservative philosophy to guide him, he says whatever sounds good.
So when he gets asked about taxes, he'll say whatever sounds like it will meet with acclaim, regardless of whether it has any relationship to what Republicans are actually trying to do. Which is going to make their job — convincing the public that a gigantic tax cut for corporations and the wealthy will cure the country of all its ills — a lot more difficult.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
Today's political cartoons - November 16, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - tears of the trade, monkeyshines, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 wild card cartoons about Trump's cabinet picks
Cartoons Artists take on square pegs, very fine people, and more
By The Week US Published
-
How will Elon Musk's alliance with Donald Trump pan out?
The Explainer The billionaire's alliance with Donald Trump is causing concern across liberal America
By The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published