Trump's strategy to fight Mueller is crazy — but it's just crazy enough to work
On the brazen idiocy of the president's propaganda campaign against the FBI
Here's what President Trump wants you to believe: At the direction of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the FBI planted spies inside the Trump campaign in order to gather (or plant) information they would later use to concoct a made-up story about Russian collusion, using it in an attempt to destroy the president. Most diabolical of all, they kept the fact that they were doing so secret from the voting public during 2016, because ... well, no one has quite worked that part out yet. But rest assured, once all the facts are known, the perfidy of the Deep State will be the worst scandal in American history.
If you read the above and said, "What a bizarre collection of lies and innuendo. You'd have to be a lunatic to believe it," then congratulations. You are either not a Trump supporter, or in full possession of your faculties, or both. Otherwise, you are part of the president's target audience, or perhaps you're the president himself.
There have been plenty of propaganda campaigns in American history, but nearly all of them proceeded from the premise that they had to be persuasive to a genuinely undecided person, perhaps even a person who wasn't a member of the president's party. They'd appeal to universal values like safety or justice. They'd provide evidence for their assertions, even if the evidence was questionable or fabricated. They'd do their best to avoid claims that were obviously false from the moment they were spoken.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In other words, even if they were trying to fool the public into believing something that wasn't true — like that if we didn't invade Iraq then Saddam Hussein would soon attack us with his fearsome arsenal of weapons of mass destruction — they were constructed so as to have at least some connection to reality.
The campaign Donald Trump is fashioning to fight against the investigation of his various corruption scandals, however, is entirely different. It springs from his own chaotic mind, and proceeds without regard to facts or logic. And it might not even matter.
Let's begin with the president's own synopsis of the current situation:
For the record, there is no "SPY scandal." As part of a counterintelligence operation, an FBI informant reached out to people on the Trump campaign whom the bureau knew had contact with Russians in an attempt to ascertain how Russia was trying to manipulate the U.S. election. Trump took that fact and turned it around to level the false charge that the FBI was spying on him and his campaign. But once this charge emerged, it rocketed through the conservative media ecosystem, repeated over the course of just a few days in The Wall Street Journal, National Review, conservative websites like Breitbart and The Federalist, conservative talk radio shows, and multiple programs on Fox News, where it was given so much coverage you'd think it was a royal wedding.
And because this is the Trump era, a stupid idea like that one becomes the occasion for an appalling breach of ethics and norms, in which the president issues an order to the Justice Department to investigate the investigation of him and his campaign, and the Justice Department caves in. Then the president orders Justice to hand over highly classified information on the counterintelligence operation to his most shameless toady in Congress, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), so Nunes can use it to discredit the investigation.
One might ask: Aren't those moves doomed to failure? After all, Robert Mueller is proceeding systematically, and he'll find what he finds whether Trump likes it or not, and no matter how much Sean Hannity's veins pulse in rage at it.
But the whole point is to discredit in advance anything Mueller finds as an obvious fabrication resulting from this Deep State conspiracy. As Gabriel Sherman of Vanity Fair reports, "According to people familiar with Trump's thinking, his team is attempting to build the case that anti-Trump forces in the FBI entrapped his advisers using informants to plant evidence about Russian collusion." Planting evidence!
And that's not all: "The president himself is convinced that the secret F.B.I. informant who reportedly met with several Trump campaign advisers in 2016 was not merely an informant, but an Obama political operative." In fact, the informant is a former official in Republican administrations who has done extensive work for the FBI and CIA.
But if you're one of Trump's employees or allies, you have to treat all these insane theories as though they're facts. Yet if they were actually convinced he's innocent, this is pretty much the opposite of how they'd be acting. They wouldn't have to concoct bizarre stories about dark anti-Trump conspiracies and planted evidence, because they could just wait confidently for the investigation to conclude and say, "See? Told you he didn't do anything wrong."
No, this is how you'd act if you knew Trump was guilty and you knew that Mueller's ultimate conclusions (and indictments) will be damning. And let's not forget what has happened already. Trump's campaign chairman is under indictment. That chairman's deputy has pleaded guilty to a crime. Trump's national security adviser has pleaded guilty to a crime. One of Trump's campaign foreign policy advisers has pleaded guilty to a crime. Trump's "personal lawyer" is probably going to spend the next three or four millenia behind bars. Trump's son, son-in-law, and campaign chairman eagerly took a meeting to get dirt on their opponent from the Russian government, a meeting everyone then lied about at the president's direction.
And there's the key fact underlying all this discussion of "spying" on the Trump campaign: That campaign was so full of people who were potentially compromised by a hostile foreign power that the FBI felt compelled to open a counterintelligence investigation on it.
The Trump administration and its allies are obviously preparing for the moment when all the actions taken by him and those who work for him are made public in all their horrific detail. So the rest of us should prepare as well. We should remember that no matter how ludicrous the charges Trump makes to discredit the investigation, they will be reinforced and disseminated by an enormous media apparatus with a single-minded devotion to protecting the president. According to an examination by the liberal Media Matters for America, over the last year Sean Hannity's Fox News show has featured an incredible 487 segments attacking the Mueller investigation, and that's just a taste of what's to come.
Trump is treating this entire matter like a media problem and not a legal problem. He thinks if he can hold on to his party and convince them to wave away any evidence of wrongdoing, then he can avoid impeachment. And he's probably right.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published