The Democrats will apparently drink eggnog as the republic burns

Democrats believe Trump is an existential threat — except at Christmas?

Chuck Schumer and Diane Feinstein.
(Image credit: Illustrated | Mike Lawn/Fox Photos/Hulton Archive/Getty Images, Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Without casting aspersions on anyone's asparagus, I would like to ask whether anyone in Congress really takes this whole impeachment thing seriously. If they did, there is no way, I think, that we would be reading that "canceling a holiday recess for one of the most extraordinary events in the Senate's history is not popular in any corner of the chamber."

Maybe I just have been paying too much attention to the actual text of the articles of impeachment against President Trump introduced on Tuesday morning. Trump is said to have "ignored and injured the interests of the Nation." Not only that: He "will remain a threat to national security and the Constitution if allowed to remain in office."

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

As far as I can tell there are two schools of thought here, both amounting to the same thing. One says that Trump should be impeached, tried in the Senate, and, no doubt, acquitted, all before the holiday recess. This is the preferred option of the Democratic senators who are campaigning for the Democratic presidential nomination and welcome the chance for a reprieve, however brief. Then there are those like Rand Paul and Diane Feinstein who say that regardless of when Trump is impeached, the Senate trial should be put on hold until January. In either case, the argument is basically that being a member of Congress is a job like any other one that entitles its members to regularly scheduled vacations (albeit ones that are longer than those that most of us enjoy). How convenient.

This is admittedly more of a rhetorical issue for Democrats who have committed to themselves to the untenable position that this literally unprecedented crisis in the affairs of this great nation is slightly less important their annual ugly sweater parties than for GOPers who dismiss impeachment as empty partisan brinksmanship. But even there you have to wonder about their commitment to defending the president if they are not willing to force their opponents to eat their words here. If they really believe Trump has committed offenses so heinous that his remaining in office puts the lives of 300 million Americans at risk, nothing should be further from their minds here than the inconvenience of maybe having to spend a few extra weeks in Washington. They should welcome such a sacrifice with the stolidness befitting servants of the republic. If on the other hand Ukraine-gate is just the latest in a long line of tedious partisan scandal-mongering efforts to undermine Trump's presidency, of course they'll be willing to put it on ice till after New Year's.

Duty or cynicism: Which is it? Republicans should force Democrats to decide by trying to keep Congress in session until lights and reindeer sets are 90 percent off.

Matthew Walther

Matthew Walther is a national correspondent at The Week. His work has also appeared in First Things, The Spectator of London, The Catholic Herald, National Review, and other publications. He is currently writing a biography of the Rev. Montague Summers. He is also a Robert Novak Journalism Fellow.