Where does Belarus stand on the Ukraine war?
Leaked documents show Russian plan to absorb neighbouring state by 2030
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7dc2/b7dc2abad982c1e969de771828a205dda92a7bab" alt="President Alexander Lukashenko votes in a referendum on Belarus’ nuclear status"
Russia plans to absorb neighbouring Belarus by 2030, according to leaked documents seen by US and European journalists.
The 2021 Russian presidential administration paper spells out the integration of Belarus politically, militarily and economically with Moscow as part of a so-called “Union State”, said Yahoo News.
Russia’s domestic, foreign and military intelligence services (the FSB, SVR and GRU, respectively) “actively contributed to the Union State plan”, the news site said, citing an unnamed Western intelligence officer with direct knowledge of the document.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Despite Russia’s military intervention in neighbouring Ukraine, Yahoo News quoted the Western officer as saying: “The long-term goal to achieve total control over Belarus is still in force and hasn’t changed.”
Last month, Russia and Belarus expanded their joint military training exercises, raising concerns that Moscow is pressuring its closest ally to join the war in Ukraine.
Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko had previously claimed his country would not join the war, but his territory was used as a “launchpad” for a failed push towards Kyiv in February last year, said the The Moscow Times.
The 2030 plans
Russia and Belarus are “already formally part of a Union State, as per a 1999 agreement”, said Deutsche Welle (DW). But the leaked document goes further, suggesting “Russia’s plans are more about annexing Belarus by 2030”.
Entitled “Strategic Goals of the Russian Federation in Belarus”, the 17-page document “speaks of pushing back Western influence in the region and fortification against NATO”, the German broadcaster added.
One of its stated goals – holding constitutional reforms based on Russia’s priorities – “has already taken place in 2022, when Lukashenko held a referendum that was described as conciliatory to Putin”, said DW.
Military support for Russia
Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, last month vowed to extend sanctions on Russia to Belarus, accusing the country of militarily supporting the Kremlin in Ukraine.
Her comments came after Lukashenko apparently visited a Russian military base to meet troops and discuss the joint drills.
Unverified reports from Telegram channels monitoring military activity in Belarus suggested that “between 1,400 and 1,600” Russian troops then arrived in the city of Vitebsk, said Foreign Policy. While the information was not confirmed by official sources, it adds to “growing fears that Russia is planning a new military push from the north”, said the foreign affairs magazine.
Resisting the pressure
Belarus “depends on Moscow for fuel and security”, said The New York Times, and although Lukashenko has so far resisted being “drawn more centrally” into the war, he is under increasing pressure from the Kremlin.
Vladimir Putin made a rare visit to the Belarussian capital of Minsk in late December, the first time he had done so since 2019, raising further concerns. At the time, Lukashenko described himself and Putin as “co-aggressors, the most harmful and toxic people on this planet”.
Earlier in the year, Putin said that Moscow would supply Minsk with Iskander tactical missile systems and other air defence systems.
Last week, Lukashenko told foreign reporters, including the BBC, that if a single soldier entered Belarus from Ukraine “with weapons to kill my people”, he would be “ready to wage war, alongside the Russians”.
View inside Belarus
After Russia invaded Ukraine last year, an unnamed US defence official told The Washington Post that it was “very clear Minsk is now an extension of the Kremlin”.
EU foreign affairs and security policy chief Josep Borrell also called Belarus a “Russian satellite state”.
At the time, Lukashenko blamed the West for the war, claiming that sanctions and the exclusion of some Russian banks from the Swift global payments system were responsible for “pushing Russia into World War Three”.
But another major invasion from Belarusian territory would cause Lukashenko “grave political damage”, his opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya told The Atlantic last month.
“A great majority of Belarusians do not want to participate in this war,” she said, “and Lukashenko understands that too.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Sorcha Bradley is a writer at The Week and a regular on “The Week Unwrapped” podcast. She worked at The Week magazine for a year and a half before taking up her current role with the digital team, where she mostly covers UK current affairs and politics. Before joining The Week, Sorcha worked at slow-news start-up Tortoise Media. She has also written for Sky News, The Sunday Times, the London Evening Standard and Grazia magazine, among other publications. She has a master’s in newspaper journalism from City, University of London, where she specialised in political journalism.
-
How Trump is changing the US-Russia relationship
Talking Points And how will Europe, Ukraine respond?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Trump blames Ukraine for war after US-Russia talks
Speed Read The US and Russia have agreed to work together on ending the Ukraine war — but President Trump has flipped America's approach
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'Whether we like it or not, social media is the public square of the 21st century'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, The Week US Published
-
Is the British Army ready to deploy to Ukraine?
Today's Big Question The UK 'would be expected to play a major role' if a peacekeeping force is sent to enforce ceasefire with Russia
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
What will Trump-Putin Ukraine peace deal look like?
Today's Big Question US president 'blindsides' European and UK leaders, indicating Ukraine must concede seized territory and forget about Nato membership
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Ukraine's disappearing army
Under the Radar Every day unwilling conscripts and disillusioned veterans are fleeing the front
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Cuba's mercenaries fighting against Ukraine
The Explainer Young men lured by high salaries and Russian citizenship to enlist for a year are now trapped on front lines of war indefinitely
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Ukraine-Russia: are both sides readying for nuclear war?
Today's Big Question Putin changes doctrine to lower threshold for atomic weapons after Ukraine strikes with Western missiles
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Incendiary device plot: Russia's 'rehearsals' for attacks on transatlantic flights
The Explainer Security officials warn of widespread Moscow-backed 'sabotage campaign' in retaliation for continued Western support for Ukraine
By The Week UK Published
-
Where is the safest place in a nuclear attack?
In Depth From safest countries to the most secure parts of buildings, these are the spots that offer the most protection
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
The North Korean troops readying for deployment in Ukraine
The Explainer Third country wading into conflict would be 'the first step to a world war' Volodymyr Zelenskyy has warned
By The Week UK Published