'Tariff stacking' is creating problems for businesses
Imports from China are the most heavily affected
One of the results of President Donald Trump's back-and-forth trade war is that some business owners are paying much more than they had anticipated due to the economic phenomenon of tariff stacking, when separate tariffs are compounded. While tariff stacking is mostly being felt by Americans who import Chinese goods, business owners across the U.S. seem to be wary of the continuing trade war, no matter which country is importing goods.
What is 'tariff stacking'?
It is an economic scenario that occurs "when multiple tariffs apply to the same imported product under separate trade actions," according to the trade policy tracker Global Trade Alert. This can create "cumulative duties that increase the product's final effective rate," as is the case when Trump puts multiple tariffs on a country through executive actions.
However, not all tariffs stack on top of each other. Some "apply cumulatively, others are mutually exclusive," said Global Trade Alert. Trump's Executive Order 14289 established rules for tariff stacking whereby "certain tariff regimes supersede others and cannot stack."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
How is this affecting American businesses?
It can cause small business owners to pay more than simply the initial cost of the tariffs, economic experts say. When Trump "adds a new tariff, the old ones don't go away," said Reuters. For many businesses, this means their "tariff bills are often far higher than the headline number touted in trade talks."
Tariff stacking is most often felt by companies that import Chinese goods because China has been one of the main targets of Trump's tariffs. The newest example is a deal between China and the United States that would see 55% tariffs on Chinese goods instead of the previous 30%. The White House downplayed the new tariffs' effect, saying that the "55% was not an increase on the previous 30% tariff on China because Trump was including preexisting tariffs," said The Associated Press.
But it is unclear whether this is true, as the 55% is "in part only an estimate of what the average preexisting tariffs were," said Reuters. For some, this could mean ambiguity. One example: John Hamer, the president of Rodgers Wade Manufacturing in Paris, Texas, who "isn't sure what his tariff total will be now," he told Reuters.
Even when Trump paused his steepest tariffs on China in May 2025, not much relief was offered to importers because stacking multiple import taxes sent the "true cost well above 30%," said CNBC. The "multiple layers of tariffs are a big problem for basic items like kids' backpacks that come largely from China," Dan Anthony, the president of Trade Partnership Worldwide, said to CNBC. "You're talking about rates of over 70%."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Other products don't have tariff rates quite as high, but are still facing significant upticks. Cotton sweaters "from China face a 46.5% tariff," while "women's bathing suits from China face a tariff of 54.9%" and "baby's dresses from China face a tariff of 41.5%," said CNBC. Some businesses are reportedly rethinking their models. "As a small business owner handling so much on my own, I can't afford the added stress," said Anjali Bhargava, the founder of spice company Anjali's Cup, to CNBC, adding that her company "will be discontinuing products as the special vacuum seal tins she uses sell out."
Justin Klawans has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022. He began his career covering local news before joining Newsweek as a breaking news reporter, where he wrote about politics, national and global affairs, business, crime, sports, film, television and other news. Justin has also freelanced for outlets including Collider and United Press International.
-
Will AI kill the smartphone?In The Spotlight OpenAI and Meta want to unseat the ‘Lennon and McCartney’ of the gadget era
-
Must-see bookshops around the UKThe Week Recommends Lose yourself in beautiful surroundings, whiling away the hours looking for a good book
-
A Nipah virus outbreak in India has brought back Covid-era surveillanceUnder the radar The disease can spread through animals and humans
-
Leadership: A conspicuous silence from CEOsFeature CEOs were more vocal during Trump’s first term
-
The end for central bank independence?The Explainer Trump’s war on the US Federal Reserve comes at a moment of global weakening in central bank authority
-
Will Trump’s 10% credit card rate limit actually help consumers?Today's Big Question Banks say they would pull back on credit
-
Can Trump make single-family homes affordable by banning big investors?Talking Points Wall Street takes the blame
-
Ski town strikers fight rising cost of livingThe Explainer Telluride is the latest ski resort experiencing a patroller strike
-
How prediction markets have spread to politicsThe explainer Everything’s a gamble
-
What will the US economy look like in 2026?Today’s Big Question Wall Street is bullish, but uncertain
-
Tariffs have American whiskey distillers on the rocksIn the Spotlight Jim Beam is the latest brand to feel the pain
