Reaction: government said care homes were safe despite experts’ Covid-19 warnings
Ministers under fire for telling sector that elderly residents were ‘very unlikely’ to be infected
Downing Street is under pressure to explain why the government failed to warn the care sector about the risks of Covid-19, as new figures reveal that a quarter of deaths in UK care homes in the past two months were linked to the virus.
According to Office for National Statistics data for March and April, care homes in England and Wales recorded a total of 45,899 deaths, of which 12,526 (27%) mentioned Covid-19 on the death certificate.
The publication of the figures coincides with reports that ministers were warned of a serious risk of “sustained transmission” of coronavirus through care homes two weeks before the government advised that it was “very unlikely” elderly residents would be infected.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
According to The Times, the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Modelling committee (SPI-M) sent a briefing to the government’s panel of scientific advisors on 10 February stating: “It is a realistic probability that there is already sustained transmission in the UK, or that it will become established in the coming weeks.”
Yet on 25 February, Public Health England (PHE) told the care sector that “there is currently no transmission of Covid-19 in the community”.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Start your trial subscription today –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Labour’s shadow care minister Liz Kendall said: “Ministers deny they were slow to tackle the virus in care homes, and say they acted as soon as they had advice, but according to this document there were clear warnings that community transmission was happening as early as February.”
Earlier this week, Health Secretary Matt Hancock said that the suggestion the care sector was “let down” by the government was “unfair”.
This view is not shared by Martin Green, chief executive of charity Care England, who told the Financial Times that “it was a mistake not to prioritise care homes from the start. We knew the 430,000 people in care homes included some of the most vulnerable people.”
Allowing so many care home residents to die amounts to nothing less than “culpable neglect”, says an editorial in The Guardian.
“Given the disproportionate impact of Covid-19 on the elderly, it was surely legitimate to expect a new focus and grip from Westminster as the virus took hold,” the newspaper argues. “Instead, care homes continue to lack basic essentials as the disease sweeps through a vulnerable elderly population of 410,000.”
The Financial Times agrees, saying that the “frail residents of the country’s 11,300 care homes have emerged as the hidden victims of an overwhelmed, underprepared system plagued by shifting guidelines that some experts fear have had lethal consequences”.
According to The Times’ columnist Philip Collins, “this scandal has been a long time coming, which makes it all the worse… Social care, which is buried away in local government rather than in the sanctuary of the NHS, suffered the brunt of austerity.”
“The Conservative Party has wasted a lot of time on a lot of nonsense, especially since 2015,” he concludes. “It cannot escape censure for what is happening now.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
7 beautiful towns to visit in Switzerland during the holidays
The Week Recommends Find bliss in these charming Swiss locales that blend the traditional with the modern
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
The Week contest: Werewolf bill
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
'This needs to be a bigger deal'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
John Prescott: was he Labour's last link to the working class?
Today's Big Quesiton 'A total one-off': tributes have poured in for the former deputy PM and trade unionist
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Donald Trump wreck the Brexit deal?
Today's Big Question President-elect's victory could help UK's reset with the EU, but a free-trade agreement with the US to dodge his threatened tariffs could hinder it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Bob Woodward's War: the explosive Trump revelations
In the spotlight Nobody can beat Watergate veteran at 'getting the story of the White House from the inside'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Trump kept up with Putin, sent Covid tests, book says
Speed Read The revelation comes courtesy of a new book by Bob Woodward
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'The federal government's response to the latest surge has been tepid at best'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published