Lin-Manuel Miranda was right to cut a 'Donald Trump' lyric
From the headlines, Lin-Manuel Miranda's decision to remove a reference to Donald Trump from In the Heights might seem strictly political.
"Lin-Manuel Miranda Scrubs Donald Trump Lyric from Film Version of In the Heights" wrote Remezcla, using a metaphor of sanitization. The National Review's Armond White took it a step further, describing Miranda's rewritten lyric as "cultural erasure and self-delusion."
Miranda, after all, once told Trump that he's "going straight to hell," and shortly after the 2016 election, Hamilton's cast famously called out then-Vice-President-elect Mike Pence, who was in the audience. But Miranda's tweaked lyric in the fantastic movie adaptation of In the Heights, out today, has far more to do with how the symbol of Trump has so drastically changed that the original intention of the line as a lighthearted, braggadocious fantasy is actually ruined by preserving the reference.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In the original 2008 Broadway version of In the Heights — written long before Trump ever publicly described Mexican immigrants as "rapists and murderers" or tried to trade "dirty and poor" Puerto Rico for Greenland — the taxi dispatcher Benny dreams about what he'd do if he won the lottery. "I'll be a businessman, richer than Nina's daddy/Donald Trump and I on the links, and he's my caddy," Benny raps. In the 2021 movie (and in several of the more recent performances of "96,000"), Benny name-checks Tiger Woods instead.
When Miranda wrote the lyric in the early 2000s, Trump was "just, like, a famous rich person," he recently told Variety. Look no further than rappers' ample references, at the time, to Donald Trump as an easy three-syllable stand-in for wealth and arrogance.
One aggressively anti-immigrant presidential term, hundreds of thousands of dead Americans, and a failed insurrection later, though, and Trump's name as a literary allusion no longer evokes business success. Hearing "Trump" instead distracts an audience; the name is so loaded with extraneous associations that some classic musicals have actually rewritten lyrics to avoid using "trump," the nonpartisan adjective.
As In the Heights' screenwriter Quiara Alegría Hudes told Entertainment Weekly, "When that lyric was written, it was in a teasing way." No longer. And as any good writer knows, when a line starts feeling forced, it's time to hit "delete."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Jeva Lange was the executive editor at TheWeek.com. She formerly served as The Week's deputy editor and culture critic. She is also a contributor to Screen Slate, and her writing has appeared in The New York Daily News, The Awl, Vice, and Gothamist, among other publications. Jeva lives in New York City. Follow her on Twitter.
-
6 homes for entertainingFeature Featuring a heated greenhouse in Pennsylvania and a glamorous oasis in California
-
Obesity drugs: Will Trump’s plan lower costs?Feature Even $149 a month, the advertised price for a starting dose of a still-in-development GLP-1 pill on TrumpRx, will be too big a burden for the many Americans ‘struggling to afford groceries’
-
The ‘Kavanaugh stop’Feature Activists say a Supreme Court ruling has given federal agents a green light to racially profile Latinos
-
Affordability: Does Trump have an answer?Feature Trump ‘refuses to admit there is a problem’
-
Trump pivots on Epstein vote amid GOP defectionsSpeed Read The president said House Republicans should vote on a forced release of the Justice Department’s Jeffrey Epstein files
-
Is Marjorie Taylor Greene undergoing a political realignment?TALKING POINTS The MAGA firebrand made a name for herself in Congress as one of Trump’s most unapologetic supporters. One year into Trump’s second term, a shift is afoot.
-
How are these Epstein files so damaging to Trump?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As Republicans and Democrats release dueling tranches of Epstein-related documents, the White House finds itself caught in a mess partially of its own making
-
Will California tax its billionaires?Talking Points A proposed one-time levy would shore up education and Medicaid
-
Catholic bishops rebuke Trump on immigrationSpeed Read ‘We feel compelled’ to ‘raise our voices in defense of God-given human dignity,’ the bishops said
-
House releases Epstein emails referencing TrumpSpeed Read The emails suggest Trump knew more about Epstein’s sex trafficking of underage women than he has claimed
-
A free speech debate is raging over sign language at the White HouseTalking Points The administration has been accused of excluding deaf Americans from press briefings
