Jan. 6 committee has already started receiving Trump documents after Supreme Court ruling

Shortly after the Supreme Court rejected former President Donald Trump's bid to block the release of his White House documents to the House Jan. 6 select committee on Wednesday night, the committee said it "has already begun to receive records that the former president had hoped to keep hidden." The Supreme Court's decision "is a victory for the rule of law and American democracy," the Jan. 6 committee said.
The Supreme Court's decision Wednesday "may be the most significant moment yet for the Jan. 6 select committee investigating the attack on the Capitol," Politico reports. "It will help the panel connect dots between Trump's efforts to stoke disinformation about the 2020 election results and his awareness of the threat of violence posed by the groups that heeded his call to descend on Washington. They'll also reveal details about what actions he took as the mob of his supporters surrounded and breached the Capitol, overrunning law enforcement and sending Congress fleeing for safety."
The unsigned Supreme Court decision held that Trump's claim of executive privilege, despite President Biden's waiver of that claim, does raise "serious and substantial concerns," but they need not be addressed in this case because the federal appellate court had determined Trump would lose his appeal "even if he were the incumbent." Trump's lawyers had argued the case was important for all future former presidents and their "clear right to protect their confidential records from premature dissemination."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"I'm not sure it's possible to overstate how thorough and brutal a defeat this short-lived litigation was for Trump and his allies," conservative lawyer and prominent Trump critic George Conway tweeted.
"Trump's theme here was to point to the specter of a future president vindictively releasing privileged materials of a former president and thereby doing great harm to the nation and to the presidency," Conway summarized. And the Supreme Court appeared to agree, because it "went out of its way to leave open the possibility that a former president could successfully invoke a privilege over a current president's determination. Put simply, Trump's own argument, by highlighting the danger of a future Trump, made the result even worse for Trump."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
ICE: Targeting essential workers
Feature After a brief pause, the Trump administration resumes its mass deportation plan
-
'No Kings': A turning point for the resistance?
Feature Millions of Americans nationwide took to the streets to protest against the Trump administration
-
Trump: Making the military into a 'partisan militia'?
Feature Donald Trump held a military parade just days after sending troops to stop protests in Los Angeles
-
Judges order release of 2 high-profile migrants
Speed Read Kilmar Ábrego García is back in the US and Mahmoud Khalil is allowed to go home — for now
-
US assessing bomb damage to Iran nuclear sites
Speed Read Trump claims this weekend's US bombing obliterated Tehran's nuclear program, while JD Vance insists the US is 'not at war with Iran'
-
Is the US sliding into autocracy?
Talking Point Donald Trump's use of federal troops on home ground, dismissal of dissent and 'braggadocious' military posturing are all symptoms of a shifting political culture
-
Court allows National Guard in LA as Dodgers repel feds
Speed Read The team said they 'denied entry' to ICE agents seeking to enter their stadium
-
'Is it even possible to enjoy a trip without contributing to the problem?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day