Jan. 6 committee has already started receiving Trump documents after Supreme Court ruling
Shortly after the Supreme Court rejected former President Donald Trump's bid to block the release of his White House documents to the House Jan. 6 select committee on Wednesday night, the committee said it "has already begun to receive records that the former president had hoped to keep hidden." The Supreme Court's decision "is a victory for the rule of law and American democracy," the Jan. 6 committee said.
The Supreme Court's decision Wednesday "may be the most significant moment yet for the Jan. 6 select committee investigating the attack on the Capitol," Politico reports. "It will help the panel connect dots between Trump's efforts to stoke disinformation about the 2020 election results and his awareness of the threat of violence posed by the groups that heeded his call to descend on Washington. They'll also reveal details about what actions he took as the mob of his supporters surrounded and breached the Capitol, overrunning law enforcement and sending Congress fleeing for safety."
The unsigned Supreme Court decision held that Trump's claim of executive privilege, despite President Biden's waiver of that claim, does raise "serious and substantial concerns," but they need not be addressed in this case because the federal appellate court had determined Trump would lose his appeal "even if he were the incumbent." Trump's lawyers had argued the case was important for all future former presidents and their "clear right to protect their confidential records from premature dissemination."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"I'm not sure it's possible to overstate how thorough and brutal a defeat this short-lived litigation was for Trump and his allies," conservative lawyer and prominent Trump critic George Conway tweeted.
"Trump's theme here was to point to the specter of a future president vindictively releasing privileged materials of a former president and thereby doing great harm to the nation and to the presidency," Conway summarized. And the Supreme Court appeared to agree, because it "went out of its way to leave open the possibility that a former president could successfully invoke a privilege over a current president's determination. Put simply, Trump's own argument, by highlighting the danger of a future Trump, made the result even worse for Trump."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
How are these Epstein files so damaging to Trump?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As Republicans and Democrats release dueling tranches of Epstein-related documents, the White House finds itself caught in a mess partially of its own making
-
Margaret Atwood’s memoir, intergenerational trauma and the fight to make spousal rape a crime: Welcome to November booksThe Week Recommends This month's new releases include ‘Book of Lives: A Memoir of Sorts’ by Margaret Atwood, ‘Cursed Daughters’ by Oyinkan Braithwaite and 'Without Consent' by Sarah Weinman
-
‘Tariffs are making daily life less affordable now’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
How are these Epstein files so damaging to Trump?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As Republicans and Democrats release dueling tranches of Epstein-related documents, the White House finds itself caught in a mess partially of its own making
-
Will California tax its billionaires?Talking Points A proposed one-time levy would shore up education and Medicaid
-
Trump DOJ sues to block California redistrictingSpeed Read California’s new congressional map was drawn by Democrats to flip Republican-held House seats
-
GOP retreats from shutdown deal payout provisionSpeed Read Senators are distancing themselves from a controversial provision in the new government funding package
-
Catholic bishops rebuke Trump on immigrationSpeed Read ‘We feel compelled’ to ‘raise our voices in defense of God-given human dignity,’ the bishops said
-
House releases Epstein emails referencing TrumpSpeed Read The emails suggest Trump knew more about Epstein’s sex trafficking of underage women than he has claimed
-
A free speech debate is raging over sign language at the White HouseTalking Points The administration has been accused of excluding deaf Americans from press briefings
-
Newsom slams Trump’s climate denial at COP30speed read Trump, who has called climate change a ‘hoax,’ declined to send any officials to this week’s summit
