Experts are skeptical of Trump's 2 floated legal defenses in 2020 election case
Former President Donald Trump will be arraigned in federal court in Washington, D.C., on Thursday afternoon on four felony counts of conspiracy and obstruction tied to his efforts to overturn his 2020 loss to President Biden.
In "the court of public opinion," Trump's "defense can be boiled down to three words: What about Hunter?" Peter Baker wrote at The New York Times. But Trump's lawyers are also previewing at least two arguments they could use to defend him in federal court.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Legal experts "say there's little legal merit to Trump's First Amendment claims," The Associated Press reported. Asserting that he was relying on the advice of lawyers is "more likely to provide Mr. Trump with a stronger defense than if he invoked the First Amendment," the Times added. But as former Attorney General William Barr noted on CNN Wednesday night, an advice-of-counsel defense would require Trump "to get on the stand and subject himself to cross-examination," and "I think it would not come out very well for him" if he took the stand.
The Justice Department is not attacking Trump's "First Amendment right," Barr told CNN. Trump "can say whatever he wants. He can even lie. He can even tell people that the election was stolen, when he knew better. But that does not protect you from entering into a conspiracy. All conspiracies involve speech, and all fraud involves speech."
"There is no First Amendment privilege to commit crimes just because you did it by speaking," and "there is no First Amendment privilege for giving directions or suggestions to other people to engage in illegal acts," Duke University law professor Samuel Buell told the Times. "Tony Soprano can't invoke the First Amendment for telling his crew he wants someone whacked," he added. So that defense "won't work legally but it will have some appeal politically, which is why he is pushing it."
-
The elite falcon trade in the Middle EastUnder the Radar Popularity of the birds of prey has been ‘soaring’ despite doubts over the legality of sourcing and concerns for animal welfare
-
A running list of the international figures Donald Trump has pardonedin depth The president has grown bolder in flexing executive clemency powers beyond national borders
-
Mixed nuts: RFK Jr.’s new nutrition guidelines receive uneven reviewsTalking Points The guidelines emphasize red meat and full-fat dairy
-
A running list of the international figures Donald Trump has pardoned
in depth The president has grown bolder in flexing executive clemency powers beyond national borders
-
Trump pulls US from key climate pact, other bodiesSpeed Read The White House removed dozens of organizations from US participation
-
What is the Donroe Doctrine?The Explainer Donald Trump has taken a 19th century US foreign policy and turbocharged it
-
A running list of the US government figures Donald Trump has pardonedin depth Clearing the slate for his favorite elected officials
-
‘Space is one of the few areas of bipartisan agreement in Washington’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump fears impeachment if GOP loses midtermsSpeed Read ‘You got to win the midterms,’ the president said
-
Nicolás Maduro: from bus driver to Venezuela’s presidentIn the Spotlight Shock capture by US special forces comes after Maduro’s 12-year rule proved that ‘underestimating him was a mistake’
-
Hegseth moves to demote Sen. Kelly over videospeed read Retired Navy fighter pilot Mark Kelly appeared in a video reminding military service members that they can ‘refuse illegal orders’
