Former President Donald Trump will be arraigned in federal court in Washington, D.C., on Thursday afternoon on four felony counts of conspiracy and obstruction tied to his efforts to overturn his 2020 loss to President Biden.
In "the court of public opinion," Trump's "defense can be boiled down to three words: What about Hunter?" Peter Baker wrote at The New York Times. But Trump's lawyers are also previewing at least two arguments they could use to defend him in federal court.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Legal experts "say there's little legal merit to Trump's First Amendment claims," The Associated Press reported. Asserting that he was relying on the advice of lawyers is "more likely to provide Mr. Trump with a stronger defense than if he invoked the First Amendment," the Times added. But as former Attorney General William Barr noted on CNN Wednesday night, an advice-of-counsel defense would require Trump "to get on the stand and subject himself to cross-examination," and "I think it would not come out very well for him" if he took the stand.
The Justice Department is not attacking Trump's "First Amendment right," Barr told CNN. Trump "can say whatever he wants. He can even lie. He can even tell people that the election was stolen, when he knew better. But that does not protect you from entering into a conspiracy. All conspiracies involve speech, and all fraud involves speech."
"There is no First Amendment privilege to commit crimes just because you did it by speaking," and "there is no First Amendment privilege for giving directions or suggestions to other people to engage in illegal acts," Duke University law professor Samuel Buell told the Times. "Tony Soprano can't invoke the First Amendment for telling his crew he wants someone whacked," he added. So that defense "won't work legally but it will have some appeal politically, which is why he is pushing it."
-
Is hands-off investing the way to go?The Explainer In many cases, your money might be better off left alone
-
Sloth fever shows no signs of slowing downThe explainer The vector-borne illness is expanding its range
-
'With every technological advance, there are risks'Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
DOGE put Social Security data at risk, official saysSpeed Read DOGE workers made the personal information of hundreds of millions of Americans vulnerable to identity theft
-
Court rejects Trump suit against Maryland US judgesSpeed Read Judge Thomas Cullen, a Trump appointee, said the executive branch had no authority to sue the judges
-
Can anyone save Jimmy Lai?Today's Big Question 'Britain's shameful inaction' will mean it's partly 'responsible' if Hong Kong businessman dies in prison
-
Trump expands National Guard role in policingSpeed Read The president wants the Guard to take on a larger role in domestic law enforcement
-
Trump says he's firing Federal Reserve Governor Lisa CookSpeed Read The move is likely part of Trump's push to get the central bank to cut interest rates
-
America: Are we now living in an autocracy?Feature 200 days into his presidency and Trump is still deepening his authoritarian grip
-
Red states join in Trump's D.C. crackdownFeature 1,200 troops arrive in Washington D.C. from six red states
-
Pomp but little progress at Trump's Ukraine talksFeature Trump's red carpet welcoming for Putin did little to advance a peace deal with Ukraine
