Steve Bannon: De facto president?
Trump's decision to elevate chief strategist to a top national security role branded 'stone cold crazy'
Donald Trump has elevated his chief strategist, Steve Bannon, to a top national security post while downgrading the roles of the director of national intelligence and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff.
The move adds Bannon to the "principals committee" of the National Security Council (NSC), a role usually filled by the defence and state secretaries and senior intelligence officials.
The White House also announced that meetings would only be attended by the director of national intelligence and chairman of the joint chiefs of staff if the "issues pertaining to their responsibilities and expertise are to be discussed".
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The decision has caused uproar in the US political establishment, with Susan Rice, national security adviser under the Obama administration, calling it "stone cold crazy".
Who is Steve Bannon?
The former chairman of ultra-Conservative media group Breitbart News has gradually manoeuvred himself to become Trump's most trusted adviser.
"Bannon is a deft operator within the White House, and he has been praised by Republicans who view him sceptically as the most knowledgeable on policy around the President," says the New York Times. He was the main instigator of Trump's executive order banning refugees from seven predominantly Muslim nations.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
However, he has been accused of "running a cabal, almost like a shadow national security council", by one intelligence official, who told the Foreign Policy website that Bannon was ensuring there was no paper trail or documentation of what was being discussed at prominent meetings in the White House.
Why the furore?
With this latest executive order, Bannon is "positioning himself not merely as a Svengali but as the de facto president", said the New York Times in an editorial this week.
It added that "in giving Bannon an official role in national security policy making, Trump has not simply broken with tradition but has embraced the risk of politicising national security".
David Rothkopf, who has written two histories of the NSC, told The Guardian that the decision would cause reverberations within the global security community.
Placing Bannon on the NSC, with his lack of national security experience, was a "radical" step, he said, adding: "It is not an overstatement to say we have a brewing crisis."
-
Who were the ‘weekend snipers’ of Sarajevo?Under the Radar Italian authorities launch investigation into allegations far-right gun enthusiasts paid to travel to Bosnian capital and shoot civilians ‘for fun’ during the four-year siege
-
A free speech debate is raging over sign language at the White HouseTalking Points The administration has been accused of excluding deaf Americans from press briefings
-
Glinda vs. Elphaba, Jennifer Lawrence vs. postpartum depression and wilderness vs. progress in November moviesthe week recommends This month’s new releases include ‘Wicked: For Good,’ ‘Die My Love’ and ‘Train Dreams’
-
A free speech debate is raging over sign language at the White HouseTalking Points The administration has been accused of excluding deaf Americans from press briefings
-
‘America today isn’t just looking to overcome’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Is Trump a lame duck president?Talking Points Republicans are considering a post-Trump future
-
Trump pardons 2020 fake electors, other GOP alliesSpeed Read The president pardoned Rudy Giuliani and more who tried to overturn his 2020 election loss
-
Trump’s trade war: has China won?Talking Point US president wanted to punish Beijing, but the Asian superpower now holds the whip hand
-
‘This is where adaptation enters’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump ordered to fully fund SNAPSpeed Read The Justice Department is appealing the decision
-
Trump tariffs face stiff scrutiny at Supreme CourtSpeed Read Even some of the Court’s conservative justices appeared skeptical