Donald Trump has elevated his chief strategist, Steve Bannon, to a top national security post while downgrading the roles of the director of national intelligence and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff.
The White House also announced that meetings would only be attended by the director of national intelligence and chairman of the joint chiefs of staff if the "issues pertaining to their responsibilities and expertise are to be discussed".
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The decision has caused uproar in the US political establishment, with Susan Rice, national security adviser under the Obama administration, calling it "stone cold crazy".
Who is Steve Bannon?
The former chairman of ultra-Conservative media group Breitbart News has gradually manoeuvred himself to become Trump's most trusted adviser.
"Bannon is a deft operator within the White House, and he has been praised by Republicans who view him sceptically as the most knowledgeable on policy around the President," says the New York Times. He was the main instigator of Trump's executive order banning refugees from seven predominantly Muslim nations.
However, he has been accused of "running a cabal, almost like a shadow national security council", by one intelligence official, who told the Foreign Policy website that Bannon was ensuring there was no paper trail or documentation of what was being discussed at prominent meetings in the White House.
Why the furore?
With this latest executive order, Bannon is "positioning himself not merely as a Svengali but as the de facto president", said the New York Times in an editorial this week.
It added that "in giving Bannon an official role in national security policy making, Trump has not simply broken with tradition but has embraced the risk of politicising national security".
David Rothkopf, who has written two histories of the NSC, told The Guardian that the decision would cause reverberations within the global security community.
Placing Bannon on the NSC, with his lack of national security experience, was a "radical" step, he said, adding: "It is not an overstatement to say we have a brewing crisis."
-
China’s single mothers are teaming upUnder the Radar To cope with money pressures and work commitments, single mums are sharing homes, bills and childcare
-
Employees are branching out rather than moving up with career minimalismThe explainer From career ladder to lily pad
-
‘It is their greed and the pollution from their products that hurt consumers’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
‘It is their greed and the pollution from their products that hurt consumers’
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump targets ‘garbage’ Somalis ahead of ICE raidsSpeed Read The Department of Homeland Security will launch an immigration operation targeting Somali immigrants in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area
-
Hegseth blames ‘fog of war’ for potential war crimespeed read ‘I did not personally see survivors,’ Hegseth said at a Cabinet meeting
-
Is a Reform-Tory pact becoming more likely?Today’s Big Question Nigel Farage’s party is ahead in the polls but still falls well short of a Commons majority, while Conservatives are still losing MPs to Reform
-
‘It’s critical that Congress get involved’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Appeals court disqualifies US Attorney Alina HabbaSpeed Read The former personal attorney to President Donald Trump has been unlawfully serving as US attorney for New Jersey, the ruling says
-
The military: When is an order illegal?Feature Trump is making the military’s ‘most senior leaders complicit in his unlawful acts’
-
Ukraine and Rubio rewrite Russia’s peace planFeature The only explanation for this confusing series of events is that ‘rival factions’ within the White House fought over the peace plan ‘and made a mess of it’
