Donald Trump has elevated his chief strategist, Steve Bannon, to a top national security post while downgrading the roles of the director of national intelligence and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff.
The White House also announced that meetings would only be attended by the director of national intelligence and chairman of the joint chiefs of staff if the "issues pertaining to their responsibilities and expertise are to be discussed".
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The decision has caused uproar in the US political establishment, with Susan Rice, national security adviser under the Obama administration, calling it "stone cold crazy".
Who is Steve Bannon?
The former chairman of ultra-Conservative media group Breitbart News has gradually manoeuvred himself to become Trump's most trusted adviser.
"Bannon is a deft operator within the White House, and he has been praised by Republicans who view him sceptically as the most knowledgeable on policy around the President," says the New York Times. He was the main instigator of Trump's executive order banning refugees from seven predominantly Muslim nations.
However, he has been accused of "running a cabal, almost like a shadow national security council", by one intelligence official, who told the Foreign Policy website that Bannon was ensuring there was no paper trail or documentation of what was being discussed at prominent meetings in the White House.
Why the furore?
With this latest executive order, Bannon is "positioning himself not merely as a Svengali but as the de facto president", said the New York Times in an editorial this week.
It added that "in giving Bannon an official role in national security policy making, Trump has not simply broken with tradition but has embraced the risk of politicising national security".
David Rothkopf, who has written two histories of the NSC, told The Guardian that the decision would cause reverberations within the global security community.
Placing Bannon on the NSC, with his lack of national security experience, was a "radical" step, he said, adding: "It is not an overstatement to say we have a brewing crisis."
-
Political cartoons for January 18Cartoons Sunday’s political cartoons include cost of living, endless supply of greed, and more
-
Exploring ancient forests on three continentsThe Week Recommends Reconnecting with historic nature across the world
-
How oil tankers have been weaponisedThe Explainer The seizure of a Russian tanker in the Atlantic last week has drawn attention to the country’s clandestine shipping network
-
Trump threatens Minnesota with Insurrection ActSpeed Read The law was passed in 1807 but has rarely been used
-
The high street: Britain’s next political battleground?In the Spotlight Mass closure of shops and influx of organised crime are fuelling voter anger, and offer an opening for Reform UK
-
Why is Trump threatening defense firms?Talking Points CEO pay and stock buybacks will be restricted
-
‘The security implications are harder still to dismiss’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Judge clears wind farm construction to resumeSpeed Read The Trump administration had ordered the farm shuttered in December over national security issues
-
Trump DOJ targets Fed’s Powell, drawing pushbackSpeed Read Powell called the investigation ‘unprecedented’
-
What are Donald Trump’s options in Iran?Today's Big Question Military strikes? Regime overthrow? Cyberattacks? Sanctions? How can the US help Iranian protesters?
-
Maduro’s capture: two hours that shook the worldTalking Point Evoking memories of the US assault on Panama in 1989, the manoeuvre is being described as the fastest regime change in history
