Hillary Clinton and the and the Democratic National Committee stumped up some of the money that paid for the infamous dossier of allegations about Donald Trump’s links to Russia, insider sources have claimed.
According to The Washington Post, “people familiar with the matter” claim Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.
It was Fusion GPS that hired former British intelligence office Christopher Steele, the man at the centre of the scandal who wrote the report.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Although the report was given to Elias, “it is unclear how or how much of that information was shared with the campaign and the DNC and who in those organizations was aware of the roles of Fusion GPS and Steele”, says the Post.
CNN previously reported Fusion GPS’s anti-Trump research was initially funded by anti-Trump Republicans during the GOP primaries, and Democrats began paying the research firm later on, after Trump became the presumptive nominee.
Those involved with the Clinton campaign, including former Clinton press secretary Brian Fallon and the Democrats' communications director Xochitl Hinojosa, stressed they were not aware of the connection between the dossier and the campaign but this has not stopped the White House from seizing on the revelations:
Trump has frequently rejected any allegation that he or his campaign colluded with the Kremlin, and the President “has specifically singled out the dossier as an example of what he calls a larger smear campaign”, says The Independent.
It is understood that some of Steele’s allegations concerning possible collusion between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin, as well as certain salacious details of potential blackmail opportunities, began circulating in Washington in the summer of 2016. It is around this time that the former MI6 operative shared his findings with the FBI, which had begun its own investigation into links between Trump and Russia.
However, the findings could not be verified, and were not published until after Trump had been sworn-in in January, when Buzzfeed leaked the report.
-
Exploring ancient forests on three continentsThe Week Recommends Reconnecting with historic nature across the world
-
How oil tankers have been weaponisedThe Explainer The seizure of a Russian tanker in the Atlantic last week has drawn attention to the country’s clandestine shipping network
-
The rise of the spymaster: a ‘tectonic shift’ in Ukraine’s politicsIn the Spotlight President Zelenskyy’s new chief of staff, former head of military intelligence Kyrylo Budanov, is widely viewed as a potential successor
-
Trump threatens Minnesota with Insurrection ActSpeed Read The law was passed in 1807 but has rarely been used
-
Clintons defy House GOP on Epstein subpoenasSpeed Read The House has already received what ‘little information we have,’ the Clintons said
-
The high street: Britain’s next political battleground?In the Spotlight Mass closure of shops and influx of organised crime are fuelling voter anger, and offer an opening for Reform UK
-
Why is Trump threatening defense firms?Talking Points CEO pay and stock buybacks will be restricted
-
‘The security implications are harder still to dismiss’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Judge clears wind farm construction to resumeSpeed Read The Trump administration had ordered the farm shuttered in December over national security issues
-
Trump DOJ targets Fed’s Powell, drawing pushbackSpeed Read Powell called the investigation ‘unprecedented’
-
What are Donald Trump’s options in Iran?Today's Big Question Military strikes? Regime overthrow? Cyberattacks? Sanctions? How can the US help Iranian protesters?
