Donald Trump sets his sights on tougher libel laws
The US President calls for laws to be changed in the wake of a critical behind-the-scenes book

Donald Trump has said he wants to strengthen libel laws, after a controversial book detailed the inner workings of his White House.
As the fallout continued from Michael Wolff’s book Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, the US President hit out at the US’s “very weak” libel laws and said he would like to toughen them.
If libel laws were stronger, he said, “you wouldn’t have things like that happen where you can say whatever comes into your head”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
This is not the first time Trump has attacked US libel laws and press freedom. During the 2016 presidential campaign he said: “I’m going to open up our libel laws so when they write purposely negative and horrible and false articles, we can sue them and win lots of money.” At the time, CNN says this marked “a dramatic escalation from Trump’s typical anti-media rhetoric” which incensed many journalists.
In October of that year, just weeks before the election, Trump said America's press protections went too far and should more closely resemble British law.
In March 2017, he again hit out at The New York Times, saying he was unhappy with its reporting of his campaign and administration.
So can the President change the libel laws?
There is no single federal law on libel - instead, it varies from state to state. Since the US Supreme Court’s 1964 New York Times v Sullivan ruling, however, constitutional limits have been placed on how states can define libel, notably by requiring public officials and public figures to prove malice.
This means the plaintiff has to show that the writer knew the disputed statement was false or acted with “reckless disregard”. This differs from British law, where the burden of proof is on the defendant to show that the statements they made were true, not libellous. The US law makes it harder for public figures to win libel suits.
Changing this would require either the Supreme Court to overrule it or a constitutional amendment, “neither of which is remotely likely”, says The New York Times, “though Trump could try to appoint Supreme Court justices who would vote to overturn the precedent”.
Even then, it could prove difficult, says CNN, “as there is no single law that could be changed, other than the First Amendment and the protections it gives”.
In February last year, First Lady Melania Trump settled a defamation lawsuit against a Maryland blogger who made lurid claims about her past. She also sued the parent company of the Daily Mail, which later retracted its story.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The best film reboots of all time
The Week Recommends Creativity and imagination are often required to breathe fresh life into old material
-
'More must be done'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Are masked ICE agents America's new secret police?
Today's Big Question Critics say masks undermine trust in law enforcement
-
Trump's strikes on Iran: a 'spectacular success'?
In Depth Military humiliations 'expose the brittleness' of Tehran's ageing regime, but risk reinforcing its commitment to its nuclear program
-
Will NATO countries meet their new spending goal?
today's big question The cost of keeping Trump happy
-
GOP races to revise megabill after Senate rulings
Speed Read A Senate parliamentarian ruled that several changes to Medicaid included in Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" were not permissible
-
Trump plans Iran talks, insists nuke threat gone
Speed Read 'The war is done' and 'we destroyed the nuclear,' said President Trump
-
Trump embraces NATO after budget vow, charm offensive
Speed Read The president reversed course on his longstanding skepticism of the trans-Atlantic military alliance
-
Bibi's back: what will Netanyahu do next?
Today's Big Question Riding high after a series of military victories, Israel's PM could push for peace in Gaza – or secure his own position with snap election
-
Trump judge pick told DOJ to defy courts, lawyer says
Speed Read Emil Bove, a top Justice Department official nominated by Trump for a lifetime seat, stands accused of encouraging government lawyers to mislead the courts and defy judicial orders
-
The ambiguous legal state of ectopic pregnancy care
The Explainer Rep. Kat Cammack's accusations of 'fearmongering' are the latest example of how mixed messages are complicating the debate around abortion