Ebola crisis: WHO response criticised in damning report
West Africa paid a heavy price due to the organisation's delay in sounding the alarm, say health experts
The World Health Organization has come under fire from global health experts for failing to respond soon enough to the Ebola crisis in West Africa.
"The most egregious failure [was the organisation's] delay in sounding the alarm," said Professor Ashish Jha, director of the Harvard Global Health Institute.
The organisation waited until the August 2014 to declare a public health emergency, even though the outbreak was already out of control by spring. "The cost of the delay was enormous," says Jha.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Ebola outbreak has killed more than 11,000 people since February last year – the vast majority of them in Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea – and is still ongoing.
Three cases of the deadly virus were reported in Liberia last week, two months after the country was declared free of the disease.
The outbreak has caused "immense human suffering, fear and chaos, largely unchecked by high-level political leadership or reliable and rapid institutional responses," concluded the damning report.
The panel of independent experts, convened by the Harvard Global Health Institute and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, made a series of recommendations for future outbreaks.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
It went so far as to suggest that the organisation should be stripped of its role in declaring a disease epidemic to be an international emergency, reports The Guardian.
Other strategies included helping poorer countries monitor and respond to infectious diseases, greater accountability and the establishment of a global fund to finance the development of drugs.
"Major reform [is] not only feasible, but also essential so that we do not witness such depths of suffering, death and social and economic havoc in future epidemics," Professor Peter Piot, the panel's chairman and the co-discoverer of the Ebola virus, told the BBC.
-
Political cartoons for January 17Cartoons Saturday’s political cartoons include hard hats, compliance, and more
-
Ultimate pasta alla NormaThe Week Recommends White miso and eggplant enrich the flavour of this classic pasta dish
-
Death in Minneapolis: a shooting dividing the USIn the Spotlight Federal response to Renee Good’s shooting suggest priority is ‘vilifying Trump’s perceived enemies rather than informing the public’
-
Why Greenland’s natural resources are nearly impossible to mineThe Explainer The country’s natural landscape makes the task extremely difficult
-
Iran cuts internet as protests escalateSpeed Reada Government buildings across the country have been set on fire
-
US nabs ‘shadow’ tanker claimed by RussiaSpeed Read The ship was one of two vessels seized by the US military
-
How Bulgaria’s government fell amid mass protestsThe Explainer The country’s prime minister resigned as part of the fallout
-
Femicide: Italy’s newest crimeThe Explainer Landmark law to criminalise murder of a woman as an ‘act of hatred’ or ‘subjugation’ but critics say Italy is still deeply patriarchal
-
Brazil’s Bolsonaro behind bars after appeals run outSpeed Read He will serve 27 years in prison
-
Americans traveling abroad face renewed criticism in the Trump eraThe Explainer Some of Trump’s behavior has Americans being questioned
-
Nigeria confused by Trump invasion threatSpeed Read Trump has claimed the country is persecuting Christians