If Britain had PR, Ukip would win 99 seats. Food for thought
Calls for proportional representation will come from all corners on 8 May. But there's a reason to ignore them
It is very likely – make that 100 per cent definite – that there will be calls from across the country for a new system of proportional representation once this election is over.
Lib Dems, Greens and Ukip voters will be asking why they have so few MPs considering their parties’ popular support. Others might be asking why the SNP has so many, considering its voter numbers.
But would PR really be a fairer solution? Martin Baxter of Electoral Calculus has been crunching the numbers for the Daily Telegraph to find out.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Using current predications of the expected vote share on 7 May, PR would deliver Ukip 99 seats, the Lib Dems 49, and the Greens 37 – many, many more than they can dare hope for under the current first-past-the-post system.
Labour would be down to 213, the Tories down to 201 and the SNP on 23 rather than the 50-plus currently predicted by pollsters.
Here comes the big BUT…
To reach the magic figure of 326 MPs needed for a Commons majority, no two parties’ MPs added together (excepting a highly unlikely ‘grand coalition’ of Labour and the Tories) would come anywhere near.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
“Any coalition would have to be an unwieldy three, four, or even six- party affair,” says Baxter. “It would be a recipe for fractious and fractured government.”
Before we junk the current system due to a single “unfair” election result, Baxter urges us to consider this: the average vote share for the three major parties over the 29 general elections since the year 1900 has been 44 per cent for the Conservatives, 33 per cent for Labour, and 19 per cent for the Liberals.
Compare this with the amount of “governing time” the three parties have enjoyed (counting coalitions as ‘half-government’) over the same period: Conservatives 54 per cent, Labour 29 per cent and Liberals 12 per cent.
“Now those are not quite exact matches,” Baxter admits, “but it is not an appalling outcome that flies in the face of democracy… When the losers clamour for change after the May election, we should resist their calls to chase the illusion of perfectability.”
Whether this cuts any ice with the pro-PR brigade remains to be seen - there could be some very angry voters around on 8 May. For instance, according to opinion polls, Ukip currently enjoy a 12-14 per cent share of the nation vote. But under the first-past-the-post system, the Faragists are predicted to win only one or two seats. Not 99.
-
Taking the low road: why the SNP is still standing strongTalking Point Party is on track for a fifth consecutive victory in May’s Holyrood election, despite controversies and plummeting support
-
The end of ‘golden ticket’ asylum rightsThe Explainer Refugees lose automatic right to bring family over and must ‘earn’ indefinite right to remain
-
Does Reform have a Russia problem?Talking Point Nigel Farage is ‘in bed with Putin’, claims Rachel Reeves, after party’s former leader in Wales pleaded guilty to taking bribes from the Kremlin
-
The Liberal Democrats: on the march?Talking Point After winning their highest number of seats in 2024, can the Lib Dems marry ‘stunts’ with a ‘more focused electoral strategy’?
-
Is Britain turning into ‘Trump’s America’?Today’s Big Question Direction of UK politics reflects influence and funding from across the pond
-
Behind the ‘Boriswave’: Farage plans to scrap indefinite leave to remainThe Explainer The problem of the post-Brexit immigration surge – and Reform’s radical solution
-
What difference will the 'historic' UK-Germany treaty make?Today's Big Question Europe's two biggest economies sign first treaty since WWII, underscoring 'triangle alliance' with France amid growing Russian threat and US distance
-
Is the G7 still relevant?Talking Point Donald Trump's early departure cast a shadow over this week's meeting of the world's major democracies


