Why experts are so worried about 'forever chemicals'
These man-made chemicals are in the air we breathe, the food we eat, and the water we drink. And some experts believe they're causing a public health crisis.
More than a dozen states are taking steps to ban products that contain so-called "forever chemicals" that have have been linked to serious health problems. These widely-used substances are present in water, air, and soil, as well as the blood of humans and animals, and some health experts say they are causing a public health crisis. Here's everything you need to know:
What are 'forever chemicals'?
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals that are not known to break down in the environment, which is why they're nicknamed "forever chemicals." PFAS date back to the 1940s, and are used to make products that repel heat, stains, and water. More than 9,000 PFAS have been identified. They are found in nonstick cookware, stain-resistant carpets, microwave popcorn bags, takeout packaging, firefighting foam, and waterproof hiking and camping gear. When these chemicals are produced or used, they can leech into the soil, water, and air, and over time, accumulate in the environment and the blood of people and animals.
Are they damaging to our health?
The Environmental Protection Agency says research has shown that some PFAS are linked to reproductive issues in women, like decreased fertility; developmental delays in children; increased risk of prostate, kidney, and testicular cancers; increased cholesterol levels; and interference with hormones. There are a lot of things the EPA is still trying to understand about PFAS, including how to remove the chemicals from drinking water and how to manage and dispose of them.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Biden administration first announced in the fall of 2021 that it was accelerating efforts to protect Americans from PFAS, and on March 14, the EPA proposed limiting the amount of PFAS in drinking water to the lowest level detected by tests, 4 parts per trillion. This would be the measurement standard for PFOA and PFOS, two of the most common types of PFAS compounds. "The science is clear that long-term exposure to PFAS is linked to significant health risks," Radhika Fox, assistant EPA administrator for water, told The Associated Press. The EPA estimates that its proposed restrictions could reduce PFAS exposure for close to 100 million Americans.
If the rule goes through, water providers will have to monitor for PFAS, which the Association of State Drinking Water Administrators said will lead to "significant rate increases ... for most of the systems" that will need to install new equipment. Fox told AP there are billions of dollars in federal funding available to help providers remove PFAS from their water.
The Food and Drug Administration is also expanding testing to better estimate how people are exposed to PFAS through food, while the Department of Agriculture is "investigating the causes and implications of PFAS in the food system." The Department of Defense is also conducting cleanup assessments at almost 700 DOD and National Guard locations where PFAS may have been released.
How bad is the problem?
Regulators do not have a clear picture of PFAS contamination in the U.S. The Guardian conducted an analysis of water samples collected in nine different cities in the United States, and found that the water test used by the EPA is so limited in its scope — it only detects 30 types of PFAS compounds — that it likely misses high levels of PFAS pollutants. "There are so many PFAS that we don't know anything about, and if we don't know anything about them, how do we know they aren't hurting us?" Kyla Bennett, policy director at the advocacy group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, told The Guardian. "Why are we messing around?"
What are state officials doing?
More than a dozen states have taken steps to ban products containing PFAS. Maine, for example, now requires companies to make public whether their products contain these chemicals. "Having this disclosure database is an important step for activists, scientists, and the general public being able to really know what is in the products and make informed decisions when they're shopping," Sarah Woodbury, director of advocacy for Defend Our Health, told The Wall Street Journal. In California, Colorado, and Maryland, state officials are working toward eliminating PFAS from cosmetics, and 11 states have already passed laws to ban PFAS in food packaging over the next several years, the Journal reports.
What are companies doing?
Many fast-food and fast-casual restaurants, including McDonald's and Panera Bread, have said they will reduce or eliminate PFAS from their packaging, and IKEA is restricting the use of PFAS in its textile materials. 3M is one of the largest PFAS manufacturers, and in December 2022 the company said it will phase them out of its products by the end of 2025. PFAS are found in 3M products like Scotchguard fabric protector, and every year, the company nets close to $1.3 billion in sales of PFAS it makes, The Verge reports.
How can humans limit their exposure to 'forever chemicals'?
The EPA says if your water comes from a public drinking-water system, contact the utility to see if they have tested the water for PFAS, and what steps they might be taking to tackle contamination. If you have a private well, conduct regular testing of the water and consider installing filters that are certified to lower PFAS levels. If you find your water is severely contaminated, find an alternate source of water and use that for drinking, cooking, and brushing your teeth. Check to see if the fish you eat comes from waterways that are contaminated, and if you have questions about whether there are PFAS in the consumer products you keep at home, contact the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
Updated March 14, 2023: This article has been updated throughout to reflect recent developments.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Catherine Garcia has worked as a senior writer at The Week since 2014. Her writing and reporting have appeared in Entertainment Weekly, The New York Times, Wirecutter, NBC News and "The Book of Jezebel," among others. She's a graduate of the University of Redlands and the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism.
-
Why Bhutan hopes tourists will put a smile back on its face
Under The Radar The 'kingdom of happiness' is facing economic problems and unprecedented emigration
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
7 beautiful towns to visit in Switzerland during the holidays
The Week Recommends Find bliss in these charming Swiss locales that blend the traditional with the modern
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
The Week contest: Werewolf bill
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
Jaguar's stalled rebrand
In the spotlight Critics and car lovers are baffled by the luxury car company's 'complete reset'
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Giant TVs are becoming the next big retail commodity
Under the Radar Some manufacturers are introducing TVs over 8 feet long
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The ocean's blue economy is growing. Can the tide continue to rise?
The Explainer The big blue is bringing in the green
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Boeing machinists approve contract, end strike
Speed Read The company's largest union approved the new contract offer, ending a seven-week strike
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Boeing machinists reject deal, continue strike
Speed Read The rejection came the same day Boeing reported a $6.2 billion quarterly loss
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
TD Bank accepts $3B fine over money laundering
Speed Read The US retail bank pleaded guilty to multiple criminal charges
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The pros and cons of globalization
Pros and Cons Globalization can promote economic prosperity but also be exploitative
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The pros and cons of labor unions
Pros and Cons Joining a labor union can have positives — and negatives
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published