- 1. As events in the US have shown, two-party politics is no longer fit for purpose
- 2. Enough with the vaccine passport hokey-cokey – some kind of jab documentation is inevitable
- 3. We are all prisoners of the times we live in
- 4. Harry and Meghan are living their best life – let’s allow them a moment of happiness
- 5. What would a properly rewilded Britain actually look like?
1. As events in the US have shown, two-party politics is no longer fit for purpose
Polly Toynbee in The Guardian
Looking across the Atlantic Ocean, Polly Toynbee says that the “lurch from Obama to Trump to Biden” shows how US politics “denies coalitions of compromise”. Writing in The Guardian, she says that the UK’s first-past-the-post electoral system creates the same problem. In contrast, she suggests that “a future of coalitions would see the power of factions within a ruling government defined transparently by electoral votes” and would mean “no more extreme factions ambushing selection processes within parties”. Finally, she adds, “a proportional system would allow both miserable old parties to divorce”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
2. Enough with the vaccine passport hokey-cokey – some kind of jab documentation is inevitable
Mark Wallace in The i
on delayed documents
The question of whether or not to have vaccine passports has “endlessly occupied ministers, civil servants and parliament in recent months”, says Mark Wallace in The i. “At various stages, the government and its opponents have ruled vaccine passports in, out, and shaken them all about”, he continues, all of which has been a process of “wasting time that could be spent on creating a workable system”. Insisting that “some kind of jab documentation is inevitable”, Wallace adds that the government should stop the “hokey-cokey” and just get on with it.
3. We are all prisoners of the times we live in
Max Hastings in The Times
on historic revisionism
Max Hastings tells readers of The Times that “on a dog-walk with a fellow writer, we agreed that we must engage with, rather than merely dismiss, the iconoclasts” who criticise controversial figures from Britain’s past. “They are right that a lot of grotesquely nationalistic history is still around”, he continues, “especially about the Second World War [where] many Churchill biographers ignore, for instance, his deplorable response to the 1943 Bengal famine”. “We need to talk about all this”, the historian adds, while acknowledging that “we cannot demand from the peoples of the past the values and language we think appropriate today”.
4. Harry and Meghan are living their best life – let’s allow them a moment of happiness
Bryony Gordon in The Daily Telegraph
on a contented couple
“Harry and Meghan are living their best life - let’s allow them a moment of happiness”, says Bryony Gordon in The Telegraph. Referring to the black and white photograph that accompanied the announcement that they are expecting a second child, Gordon gushes that “the camera never lies, and not since their wedding day have the couple looked so relaxed and happy”. She adds that “having worked with the Sussexes over the past few years, and knowing how difficult much of their early family life together has been”, she thinks their glee is simply “a lovely thing to see”.
5. What would a properly rewilded Britain actually look like?
Jon Davies in The Independent
on the wild way
A rewilded Britain would not be a “pastoral idyll in which we all picnicked amongst Wind In The Willows-style animals”, nor a “dangerous place in which apex predators like wolves, lynx and wildcats were roaming free”, says Jon Davies in The Independent. It’s nothing to be scared of, but is more likely to look “a bit messy and unloved; a patch of marshland, or the kind of forest that you can’t walk through easily because of impenetrable undergrowth”. He says to reach the goal of rewilding, “we need to get over our obsession with tidying up the countryside and see unkempt as a good thing”.
-
Israel: Losing the American publicFeature A recent poll finds American support for Israel's military action in Gaza has fallen from 50% to 32%
-
Unmaking AmericansFeature Trump is threatening to revoke the citizenship of foreign-born Americans. Could he do that?
-
EPA: A bonfire of climate change regulationsFeature The Environmental Protection Agency wants to roll back its 'endangerment finding,' a ruling that lets the agency regulate carbon emissions
-
Triangle-headed aliens touched Goldie HawnTall Tales And other stories from the stranger side of life
-
‘The UK’s malaise will not end with the Prime Minister’s exit’Instant Opinion Your digest of analysis from the British and international press
-
‘Police tactics are not getting worse, they are simply being filmed’Instant Opinion Your digest of analysis from the British and international press
-
‘G7 leaders missed a golden opportunity’Instant Opinion Your digest of analysis from the British and international press
-
‘It takes some soul searching to celebrate Canada Day’Instant Opinion Your digest of analysis from the British and international press
-
‘Breakthrough on abortion rights could be there if Biden reaches for it’Instant Opinion Your digest of analysis from the British and international press
-
‘If only Mark Meadows had even half Cassidy Hutchinson’s courage’Instant Opinion Your digest of analysis from the British and international press
-
‘Boris Johnson measures success in biceps rather than brain power’Instant Opinion Your digest of analysis from the British and international press
