What's in the debt limit deal Biden and McCarthy hope to pass before June 5


A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
President Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) reached agreement on a deal to raise the debt limit on Saturday night, released the details on Sunday, then spent Monday calling up lawmakers to ensure enough support to pass the deal before the U.S. begins to default on its financial obligations starting June 5, according to the most recent Treasury Department estimates.
The proposed deal would:
- Suspend the debt limit until January 2025, after the 2024 election. House Republicans had wanted to raise the limit until March 2024 or by $1.5 trillion, whichever came first.
- Reduce overall government spending compared to projected growth but increase defense spending. The White House says the two-year deal would lower spending by about $1 trillion over 10 years, while House Republicans point to estimates it would cut spending by $2.1 trillion if suggested budget caps were extended for another four years. The New York Times estimated that if the deal only lasted the required two years, the total savings would be about $860 billion over a decade.
- Add work requirements for food stamps for adults 50 to 54 by 2025 but eliminate those requirements for veterans, homeless people and young people leaving foster care. Those agreements expire in 2030.
- Claw back $1.4 billion and redirect up to $20 billion from the $80 billion Biden and congressional Democrats allocated to the IRS last year to go after wealthy tax cheats, modernize aging technology, and improve customer service.
- Rescind up to $30 billion in unspent Covid-19 relief money.
- Streamline and expedite the approval process for some energy projects and specifically push forward the Mountain Valley natural gas from West Virginia to Virginia, a key priority of Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Republicans.
Some of the proposed cuts would create an "economic headwind later this year and next," but not "enough to blow the economy over," Moody's Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi tweeted Sunday. Overall, the deal "is about as good as could be expected," he added, and "a sigh of relief will be appropriate when the deal becomes law, as it will help the nation avoid a recession."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Biden and McCarthy "appeared on track to gain enough bipartisan support" for the deal, The Wall Street Journal reported, "though procedural chokepoints could still complicate the race to avoid an unprecedented default."
Hard-right House Republicans, who won three seats on the 13-member Rules Committee in exchange for allowing McCarthy to become speaker, have threatened to use the committtee to block the bill from coming to a vote on Wednesday. Assuming they fail, McCarthy will need House Democrats to pass the legislation, and some progressives have said they are inclined to vote no. And passage through the Senate could take days if Republicans raise procedural hurdles, as some have promised to do. House Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) urged lawmakers to "act swiftly and pass this agreement without unnecessary delay."
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Peter Weber is a senior editor at TheWeek.com, and has handled the editorial night shift since the website launched in 2008. A graduate of Northwestern University, Peter has worked at Facts on File and The New York Times Magazine. He speaks Spanish and Italian and plays bass and rhythm cello in an Austin rock band. Follow him on Twitter.
-
'America's conservative party has collapsed'
Instant opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass Published
-
Ratings over democracy
Cartoons
By The Week Staff Published
-
Consumption rooms: a legal place for illegal drugs?
Talking Point Scotland approves UK's first trial facility where users can take drugs under medical supervision
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
'America's conservative party has collapsed'
Instant opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass Published
-
'Biden must be embarrassed he didn't think of this first'
Instant opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass Published
-
Biden creates White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention
Speed Read The office will be led by Vice President Kamala Harris
By Justin Klawans Published
-
Will the US keep aiding Ukraine?
Today's Big Question Republicans give Volodymyr Zelenskyy a 'cold shoulder' in D.C.
By Joel Mathis Published
-
Hunter Biden: a case of special treatment?
Why everyone's talking about If Hunter's surname weren't Biden, he probably wouldn't be facing these charges, say commentators
By The Week Staff Published
-
Government shutdown odds spike as House GOP hardliners thwart McCarthy, spending bills
Speed Read House Speaker Kevin McCarthy's caucus is in disarray, and the US is now hurtling toward an avoidable debacle
By Peter Weber Published
-
Should cognitive testing be a presidential prerequisite?
Today's Big Question A growing chorus of pundits and candidates are pushing mental fitness challenges as a campaign necessity
By Rafi Schwartz Published
-
Disunited nations: has the UN lost its relevance?
Missing figures at UN General Assembly lead to broad questions about the organisation's credibility
By Arion McNicoll Published