The EU's landmark AI Act 'rushed' out as countdown begins on compliance
'We will be hiring lawyers while the rest of the world is hiring coders' – Europe's warning about new AI legislation
The EU's pioneering legislation to regulate AI is set to come into force next month, despite criticisms that it is incomplete, ambiguous, and stifling to the tech industry.
The first law of its kind anywhere in the world, the EU Artificial Intelligence Act aims to protect citizens from potentially harmful uses of AI by regulating companies within the EU, without losing ground to AI superpowers China and the US.
While EU lawmakers are "mostly concerned" about consumer safety and the dissemination of deepfakes, which could mislead voters in elections, the tech community has raised "gripes" with the legislation, said Euronews. Officials are now "frantically trying to plug the holes in the regulation before it comes into force", said the Financial Times.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What does the act do?
The act, which will be implemented in stages over the next two years, classifies different types of AI by risk.
Minimal risk uses – AI-powered video games and spam filters, for example – will not be subject to regulation. Limited risk activities, such as chatbots and other generative AI platforms, will be subject to "light regulation", including transparency requirements to inform consumers that they are interacting with a machine.
The "high-risk" category includes AI systems used by law enforcement like biometric identification, as well as systems used to access public services or critical infrastructure.
A further "unacceptable risk" category bans all AI systems that "threaten citizens' rights", said The Verge. This includes AI used to deceive or manipulate humans, or profile them as potential criminals based on behaviour or personality traits.
What are the criticisms of the legislation?
Progress on the legislation, which has been in the works for three years, was "upended" in 2022 when OpenAI released ChatGPT, said the FT. The emergence of "generative AI" models, which create text or images based on user prompts, "reshaped the tech landscape" and had parliamentarians "rushing to rewrite the rules" to regulate the large language models that underpin such apps.
"Time pressure led to an outcome where many things remain open," a parliamentary aide involved in drafting the "rather vague" law told the FT. Regulators "couldn't agree on them and it was easier to compromise" on what the unidentified aide called "a shot in the dark".
Some critics say the text lacks clarity – especially on whether systems like ChatGPT are acting illegally when they use sources protected by copyright law. There is also confusion over who is responsible for content generated by AI, or what "fair remuneration" might look like for those who create the content it draws from. The act also does not specify who might enforce the rules in individual member states, or how, which could lead to patchy implementation across the continent.
The cost of compliance is also a problem, particularly for small companies. It could make it "very hard for deep tech entrepreneurs to find success in Europe", Andreas Cleve, chief executive of Danish healthcare start-up Corti, told the FT. Many believe that cost will hinder those European companies competing with the US and China. "We will be hiring lawyers while the rest of the world is hiring coders," said Cecilia Bonefeld-Dahl, director general for DigitalEurope, which represents the bloc's technology sector.
What's still to be done?
Tech companies have until February next year to comply with the "unacceptable risk" rules or face a fine of 7% of their total global annual revenue, or €35 million (£29.5 million), whichever is higher.
Developers of systems that fall in the "high risk" category will have until August 2027 to comply with rules around risk assessment and human oversight.
By some estimates, the EU needs between 60 and 70 pieces of secondary legislation regarding the details of how the act will be implemented and enforced, and those must be in place by May next year. "The devil will be in the details," a diplomat who took a leading role in drafting the act told the FT. "But people are tired and the timeline is tight."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Harriet Marsden is a writer for The Week, mostly covering UK and global news and politics. Before joining the site, she was a freelance journalist for seven years, specialising in social affairs, gender equality and culture. She worked for The Guardian, The Times and The Independent, and regularly contributed articles to The Sunday Times, The Telegraph, The New Statesman, Tortoise Media and Metro, as well as appearing on BBC Radio London, Times Radio and “Woman’s Hour”. She has a master’s in international journalism from City University, London, and was awarded the "journalist-at-large" fellowship by the Local Trust charity in 2021.
-
'Being more nuanced will not be easy for public health agencies'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Where did Democratic voters go?
Voter turnout dropped sharply for Democrats in 2024
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
4 tips to save as health care costs rise
The Explainer Co-pays, prescription medications and unexpected medical bills can really add up
By Becca Stanek, The Week US Published
-
Assisted dying: what can we learn from other countries?
The Explainer A look at the world's right to die laws as MPs debate Kim Leadbeater's proposed bill
By The Week Published
-
The rules for armed police in the UK
The Explainer What the law says about when police officers can open fire in Britain
By The Week Staff Published
-
How would assisted dying work in the UK?
The Explainer Proposed law would apply to patients in England and Wales with less than six months to live – but medics may be able to opt out
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Assisted dying: will the law change?
Talking Point Historic legislation likely to pass but critics warn it must include safeguards against abuse
By The Week UK Published
-
Where does Labour stand on trans rights?
The Explainer Party plans to 'modernise and simplify' process of changing gender and vows to scrap guidance on teaching gender ideology in schools
By The Week UK Published
-
How a Cherokee tribe used tribal sovereignty to open North Carolina's only legal cannabis dispensary
Under the radar The tribe has plans to open sales to any adult in the state, even though the drug is still illegal there
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
The state of sex work legalization around the world
In Depth The world's oldest profession has come a long way, but some say it is not enough
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
The growing US movement to end child marriages
Under the Radar Practice is 'surprisingly widespread' but only 12 states have so far banned it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published