Battle of Bakhmut: a ‘pyrrhic victory’ for Russia?
Victory for Russian forces in Ukrainian ‘meatgrinder’ more symbolic than strategic

A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
It is still unclear whether the months-long battle for control of Bakhmut has ended, with claims by Moscow that the Kremlin-backed Wagner Group had finally captured the city being countered by Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
“The meat grinder, hell on earth, the fortress, a blackened nightmare, and now Europe’s Hiroshima. Bakhmut has been called many things over the course of its nine-and-a-half month siege,” said The Telegraph, but “few descriptions capture the scale of loss and destruction”.
The small 400-year-old city in eastern Ukraine “has undoubtedly been the site of the bloodiest fighting since Vladimir Putin invaded”, said the paper, and is now “the longest battle since the Second World War”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
‘A pyrrhic victory’
US intelligence believes Russia has suffered about 100,000 casualties around the city since December last year, with 20,000 fatalities representing more than half of all Russians thought to have been killed in Ukraine since the invasion began.
The Times reported that “both sides have built up the symbolic significance of the battle”, and the Wagner Group “has sought victory as a propaganda boost for Yevgeny Prigozhin, its founder and chief, and the Kremlin”.
Yet while “Bakhmut is not of no strategic value”, said Sky News, “its worth as a conquest is limited – in that context, its capture for Russia is a pyrrhic victory”.
For Ukrainian forces “the more meaningful gauge of success” has been “their ability to keep the Russians bogged down”, said ABC News. “The Ukrainian military has aimed to deplete the resources and morale of Russian troops in the tiny but tactical patch of the 1,500-kilometre (932-mile) front line as Ukraine gears up for a major counteroffensive in the 15-month-old war.”
The battle also provides “a telling example of how Ukraine hopes to exploit the very public divisions among the three principal Russian forces fighting in Bakhmut: the Wagner private military company, loyal to Yevgeny Prigozhin, Chechen militias loyal to Ramzan Kadyrov and the regular army”, reported The New York Times.
‘Unlikely to be a turning point’
“This is a significant moment in this war,” said Sky News, “but not for the reason that Moscow will present. Yes, it has won but this massive battle is only really a small victory.”
First, “victory in Bakhmut does not necessarily bring Russia any closer to capturing the Donetsk region – Putin’s stated aim of the war”, ABC News reported.
More importantly, it has laid bare the huge cost in terms of resources and lives lost to the Kremlin of Ukraine’s strategy of draining Russia’s war machine. The battle’s brutal impact on wearing down Russian soldiers and Wagner mercenaries has led to comparisons to the bloody conflict between the German Wehrmacht and Red Army at Stalingrad, which turned the tide of the Second World War in favour of the Allies.
“For all the fanfare from the Wagner paramilitary group, the capture of Bakhmut is unlikely to be a turning point in this war,” said Sky News – “it will almost certainly not be decisive”.
The focus now turns to Ukraine’s expected counter-offensive, the success or failure of which “is far more likely to have an effect on how this terrible conflict eventually ends”, concluded the broadcaster.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
-
Yevgeny Prigozhin: will ‘predictable’ death of Wagner chief backfire on Putin?
Today's Big Question Analysts say Russian president faces growing danger from advisers and risk of revenge from Wagner fighters
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
Is Belarus the next serious threat to the West?
Today's Big Question President Lukashenko is tightening ties with Russia and China while ‘escalating tensions with Nato’
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
How much is the Russia-Ukraine war costing?
In Depth Kyiv faces $400 billion rebuilding bill and military spending could soon catch up with Russia’s economy
By Richard Windsor Published
-
Why Putin is weaponising grain in the war with Ukraine
Under the Radar Russian president’s use of food as a strategic weapon could prove brutally effective
By The Week Staff Published
-
Ukraine war: who is winning?
feature Kyiv reports some counter-offensive success but progress remains slow
By Sorcha Bradley Published
-
What role is Russia playing in the Niger coup?
Today's Big Question Vladimir Putin will ‘welcome’ chance to expand influence in region, despite no indication he was behind military takeover
By The Week Staff Published
-
Putin skips South Africa summit: will anyone arrest Russian president?
Today's Big Question Moscow has threatened war on any country that upholds international arrest warrant over war crimes in Ukraine
By Harriet Marsden Last updated
-
Two dead in Crimea bridge attack as Russia halts Ukraine grain deal
Speed Read Moscow pulls out of landmark UN agreement in response to ‘terrorist’ incident
By The Week Staff Published