Will Sunak and Starmer drop green policies to win voters?
Conservatives and Labour draw same conclusion from shock Uxbridge result but are warned move would be ‘political suicide’
Keir Starmer and Rishi Sunak could water down or even drop much of their green agenda, as both look to prioritise the economy in a bid to win voters ahead of the next general election.
Labour has spent the weekend arguing internally whether the shock loss of the Uxbridge and South Ruislip by-election means it has focused too much on green issues, after the Tories made the vote effectively a referendum on the expansion of the controversial ultra-low emission zone (Ulez) by Labour’s Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan.
A senior party figure told Politico’s London Playbook that Uxbridge should be a “wake-up call for those in Labour who think it is possible to ignore public opinion and still win … especially those who are driving anti-car policies and expecting their owners to dig deep into their pockets to pay for them”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Another Labour MP put it more bluntly in electoral terms, arguing that 41 million driving licence holders in the UK “can’t be wrong”.
What did the papers say?
The Uxbridge result – in which Tory candidate Steve Tuckwell defied the polls to retain Boris Johnson’s old seat with a slim 495-vote majority – has laid bare tensions within both Labour and the Conservatives about the cost of environmental policies for those already facing a cost-of-living crisis.
“If you threaten people’s livelihoods and what they regard as fundamental rights to mobility and self-reliance, they will get rid of you,” argued Janet Daley in The Daily Telegraph. “This must be the end of Rishi Sunak’s green obsession,” the headline read.
The prime minister is said to be “reconsidering green policies which could see consumers out of pocket amid fears that they could be electorally damaging”, according to the i news site.
Sunak is planning to “hold firm on net-zero goals”, reported The Times, while “delaying or ditching a host of measures that would impose direct costs on consumers, as he comes under pressure from the right of his party to rethink Britain’s climate commitments”.
These could include adding a so-called “Aston Martin exception” to the petrol car ban due to come into force in 2030. This would give small carmakers more time to adapt to producing electric vehicles. Additional measures under consideration are dropping additional levies on energy bills and a halt to any new low-traffic neighbourhoods.
As for Labour, earlier this month The Sunday Times reported that Starmer and his allies had become increasingly unhappy that their economic focus was being jeopardised by the party’s eco-warriors. The party’s leader allegedly went as far as saying “I hate tree huggers” – something he has denied.
What next?
There is an argument, said The Spectator’s political editor Katy Balls, that the Uxbridge result “will make it easier for Starmer and his shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves to further tone down the green message” as the party looks to thrash out the details of its next manifesto.
Some Starmer allies also “see it as further reason to clip Ed Miliband’s wings – pointing to the risk of green backfiring if it looks costly” she added. As shadow climate change and net zero secretary, the former Labour leader is driving the party’s green agenda but reports suggest he has fallen out with Starmer and could even be at risk at the next shadow cabinet reshuffle expected in the autumn.
Tom Burke, co-founder of the green think tank E3G, predicted that those within Labour who are antagonistic to green measures will look to seize the moment. The Guardian’s environment editor Fiona Harvey pointed, for example, to “some trade unions who have deep reservations about the transition to a low-carbon economy, and some in the party are fearful over Tory attacks on climate policies”.
Sensing a small but fertile window of opportunity in the face of dire poll numbers, the Tories have sought to weaponise Labour’s green message as part of a wider culture war. Last week, energy secretary Grant Shapps branded Labour “the political wing of Just Stop Oil” and demanded it pay compensation for damage caused by the group’s protesters.
But, said Burke, the Labour leadership “should be very careful in generalising from this to climate policy more generally”. It was important, he said, to “communicate far more effectively what the consequences will be of climate policy failure. That’s what’s missing from this debate.”
With climate change consistently featuring among the top concerns for voters, and amid devastating wildfires in Greece and Switzerland and an extreme heatwave across southern Europe, both party leaders have been warned any attempt to veer away from their green pledges would be “political suicide”.
The Observer cited “senior figures from business, the scientific community and across the political divide” who said that any watering down of climate policies would be deeply unpopular with voters, set back the international fight to reach net zero and damage Britain’s green reputation.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Inside the house of Assad
The Explainer Bashar al-Assad and his father, Hafez, ruled Syria for more than half a century but how did one family achieve and maintain power?
By The Week UK Published
-
Sudoku medium: December 22, 2024
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Crossword: December 22, 2024
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
How would reaching net zero change our lives?
Today's Big Question Climate target could bring many benefits but global heating would continue
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
What are Trump's plans for the climate?
Today's big question Trump's America may be a lot less green
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Starmer vs the farmers: who will win?
Today's Big Question As farmers and rural groups descend on Westminster to protest at tax changes, parallels have been drawn with the miners' strike 40 years ago
By The Week UK Published
-
Is Cop29 a 'waste of time'?
Today's Big Question World leaders stay away as spectre of Donald Trump haunts flagship UN climate summit
By The Week UK Published
-
Why is Mexico City running out of water?
Today's Big Question Climate change and bad planning bring on 'Day Zero'
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Is America running out of electrical power?
Today's Big Question The nation's power grid appears to be reaching critical levels due to emerging technologies
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
How did Japan's earthquake compare to others across the world?
Today's Big Question Relatively low death toll a testament to country's preparedness, say experts
By The Week UK Published
-
Cop28: is UAE the right host for the climate summit?
Today's Big Question Middle East nation is accused of 'pushing for a green world that can still have its oil'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published