Trade union leaders have condemned the sacking of shadow transport minister Sam Tarry hours after the frontbencher joined striking rail workers on a picket line in London.
Keir Starmer had “made clear” during last month’s rail strikes that he would not be joining the picketers and that “he expected his frontbench team to stay away, too”, The Guardian reported. The Conservatives had “spent weeks somewhat desperately attempting to blame” the Labour leader for the walkouts by RMT members, the paper said.
But while Starmer’s ban “appeared to be an attempt to prevent the Tories gaining any more ammunition”, he is now in unions’ firing line instead.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Why was Tarry sacked?
Deputy leader Angela Rayner “risked a split” with Starmer when she “signalled her support” for striking rail workers in June, said the London Evening Standard. And despite a note from Starmer’s office telling frontbenchers to avoid picket lines, “several senior Labour figures – including Scottish leader Anas Sarwar and Kate Osborne – showed their solidarity by posting pictures of themselves alongside striking workers on social media”, the paper reported.
Yesterday, as the row about pay and working conditions continued, Ilford South MP Tarry also took a stand by joining striking rail staff outside London’s Euston station. Tarry, a member of the Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association (TSSA), told Channel 4 News that “if I lose my job for standing shoulder-to-shoulder with rail workers, then so be it”.
He was sacked hours later. But according to The Times, the MP was axed for “doing media interviews without approval, rather than joining the picket line”.
A Labour Party spokesperson said: “This isn’t about appearing on a picket line. Members of the frontbench sign up to collective responsibility. That includes media appearances being approved and speaking to agreed frontbench positions.”
Whatever the reason, Tarry’s sacking has been met with fury from unions. The MP told LBC’s Ben Kentish that he had “fielded phone calls from seven different general secretaries” who were “absolutely fuming about what has happened”.
“They are now on a direct collision course with the Labour Party leadership, and that was totally avoidable,” said Tarry.
How have unions responded?
RMT general secretary Mick Lynch told Times Radio that Tarry's sacking marked a “sad day for the Labour Party”.
The TSSA said the union was “ashamed” of Starmer’s actions. General secretary Manuel Cortes said: “We expect attacks from the Tories, we don’t expect attacks from our own party.”
Gary Smith, the GMB union's general secretary, tweeted that it was a "huge own goal" for Labour to "turn a Tory transport crisis into a Labour story", reported the BBC.
And Sharon Graham, leader of Unite the Union, said Labour was "becoming more and more irrelevant to ordinary working people".
What next for Starmer?
Starmer’s relationship with the unions was “already strained”, said The Times. He “continues to struggle with the left-wing baggage he inherited from Jeremy Corbyn’s time at the Labour helm”, said The Telegraph. Now, the party has “descended into open warfare” with unions, said The Times.
Some on Labour’s left might take a “quasi-religious position” that sees unions as “sacred objects, ones beyond criticism”, said Steven Fielding, professor of political history, in The Spectator. Indeed, Starmer’s “apparently strict neutrality” has “given rise to all manner of teeth gnashing and wailing” from the left of the party, but the “discontent extends beyond the usual suspects”.
The “growing rift between organised labour and its party” is that “much of the leadership’s political strategy is dictated by the question: ‘What would Tony do?'”, said Tom Peters, former political advisor to Labour, writing at left-leaning Novara Media. Breaking from trade unions “was a key plank” of New Labour’s ideology, and Starmer seems to believe it is “an essential step on his path to government”.
But “contradiction” between Labour’s “public pronouncements of support” for workers while it distances itself from the unions “is unsustainable”. For Starmer to “navigate the tricky terrain before him”, he “must end this stand off” and work with “his greatest asset: organised labour”.
“The real test” for Starmer, said The Telegraph, will be “his handling of the rail strikes altogether”. The unions “power and influence” over Labour “remain strong because the party needs their money”.
But the party leader “also needs the votes of those being inconvenienced by the stoppages”.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.