Guilt-free flying is still some way off after a major new report found that there is currently no single, clear, sustainable alternative to jet fuel.
Flying was responsible for 2.4% of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2019 and 8% of UK emissions, according to a research briefing by the House of Commons library. And with demand for flights “expected to increase”, governments and the aviation industry are keen to find ways to reduce the climate impacts of traditional kerosene fuel, said the BBC.
Switching to sustainable fuels is a key part of the UK government’s plan to reach “jet zero” – zero-emissions flights – by 2050, which it touts as a plan to offer “guilt-free flying”. But a report from The Royal Society has found there is currently no clear sustainable alternative to jet fuel that could support the UK’s current flying habits.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
‘Alternative fuels not a short-term solution’
The Royal Society report looked at four possible alternative fuel types to replace the 12.3 million tonnes of jet fuel used annually in the UK. These are: green hydrogen (made from water using renewable energy), biofuels (made from energy crops and waste), ammonia, and synthetic fuels or e-fuels (made by capturing and converting carbon dioxide). But it found none could replace fossil jet fuel in the short term.
That’s partly because scaling up these alternative fuels will prove to be a significant – if not impossible – challenge. Producing enough biofuel to meet current demands in the UK would require “at least half of all UK agricultural land”, said the report, while sufficient amounts of green hydrogen or ammonia to fuel planes would require some “2.4 to 3.4 times the total current renewable electricity in the UK”. And the use of synthetic or e-fuels would require “5 – 8 times the UK’s 2020 renewable electricity capacity”.
Other major infrastructure barriers exist, said the BBC. Existing aeroplanes “cannot use hydrogen-based fuel”, while other alternative types of fuel under consideration, such as ammonia and synthetic fuels, also use green hydrogen – so “it is unclear if existing planes could use them”.
The scientists behind the report say that in the long term, it is likely that an alternative fuel will be developed, but it will require major changes to airport infrastructure as well as to how aeroplanes are designed.
The Royal Society report is “likely to be seized upon by environmental campaigners”, who want to “curb the number of flights in the near term” while zero-emission aviation technologies are developed in the longer term, said Business Green.
“Not all aspects of modern life in Western nations have an easy ‘technofix’ for the damage they do to the environment, and nowhere is this truer than for air travel,” Leo Murray, director of innovation at climate charity Possible, told the BBC. His organisation has suggested that the UK government tax the country’s most frequent fliers.
“A Frequent Flyer Levy would target reduced demand amongst the group responsible for most of the environmental damage today, while leaving the annual family holiday untouched,” he said.
The Royal Society report didn’t look though at the potential for electric aircraft, something the former transport secretary and aviation enthusiast Grant Shapps said is one of the “boundless possibilities” that technology can offer. As part of its “jet zero” plans, the government wants five sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) plants under construction by 2025.
A Department for Transport spokesperson said its SAF programme is “one of the most comprehensive in the world”. “Our Jet Zero Strategy sets out how we can achieve net zero emissions from UK aviation by 2050, without directly limiting demand for aviation. Sustainable Aviation Fuels and hydrogen are key elements of this, and we will ensure that there is no impact on food crops,” the spokesperson said.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.